Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.
Reports people file about their own experience are not shown here and never will be without their agreement. Tell us what happened to you.
92 incidents closest to “OpenEvidence DeepConsult” · matched on meaning · public reporting
Answer.AI's team tested Devin, an autonomous AI coding assistant, on 20 real-world tasks over a month. Devin succeeded in only 3 tasks, failed 14, and was inconclusive in 3. The team found Devin often produced overly complex or hallucinated solutions and could not recognize fundamental blockers. They ultimately decided to stick with tools that allow more human control.
5 source articles · read the reporting →
LINAGORA, a French open-source software company, launched a beta version of its large language model Lucie 7B. The model was intended to be a transparent and ethical alternative to big tech AI. However, after users tested it and highlighted its shortcomings, the model was mocked online. LINAGORA subsequently closed the platform to address the issues and collect more data.
6 source articles · read the reporting →
OpenAI has accused Chinese AI company DeepSeek of inappropriately using data from its ChatGPT model to train DeepSeek's own large language model. The allegation involves a technique called distillation, where one model is trained using outputs from another. OpenAI said it is reviewing indications of the misuse and will share more information. DeepSeek has not responded to the accusation.
6 source articles · read the reporting →
The Polish data protection authority (UODO) is investigating a complaint against OpenAI concerning ChatGPT. The complainant alleges that ChatGPT generated false information about him, and that OpenAI failed to correct it or disclose what data it holds, violating GDPR principles of lawfulness, fairness and transparency. The complainant also claims OpenAI did not fulfil its information obligations under Article 12 and Article 5(1)(a) GDPR. UODO has stated it will examine the systemic compliance of OpenAI's data processing with European data protection law.
9 source articles · read the reporting →
Cloud security firm Wiz discovered a ClickHouse database belonging to DeepSeek that was open to the internet without authentication, containing over a million lines of logs with chat histories, secret keys and backend details. Wiz disclosed the breach to DeepSeek, which promptly locked down the database. The incident highlights security risks in rapidly deploying AI services.
5 source articles · read the reporting →
The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) has launched an investigation into OpenAI, operator of the ChatGPT chatbot, in response to a complaint alleging the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information without consent. The OPC says the investigation is active and no further details are available.
9 source articles · read the reporting →
Promptfoo tested DeepSeek-R1 against a dataset of 1,360 politically sensitive prompts and found that about 85% of them were refused. The refusals followed a standard form aligned with Chinese Communist Party policy. The testing also demonstrated that the censorship could be trivially bypassed using simple jailbreak techniques, such as prompt injection or changing the context.
5 source articles · read the reporting →
A study published in npj Digital Medicine tested four commercial large language models (Bard, ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Claude) for their tendency to propagate discredited race-based medical beliefs. When asked about kidney function, lung capacity, and skin thickness, the models sometimes endorsed debunked racial differences, particularly affecting Black patients. The study concludes that these biases pose a potential hazard and urges caution before using such models in clinical decision-making.
6 source articles · read the reporting →
Patrizia Schlosser, a German investigative journalist, found more than 30 pornographic images of herself on MrDeepFakes, a website hosting non-consensual deepfake content. The images had been online for almost two years before being removed in January 2025. Bellingcat's investigation linked MrDeepFakes to apps including Deepswap and Candy.ai, which were advertised on the site. MrDeepFakes did not respond to requests for comment.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The Bavarian State Criminal Police Office (LKA) has been testing Palantir's data mining software, called VeRa, with real personal data for months. The Bavarian data protection commissioner only learned of the test through a media inquiry and has announced a review. The Interior Ministry claims the test is lawful under current law, but critics argue a legal basis is missing.
7 source articles · read the reporting →
A study presented at the ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting found that ChatGPT's responses to nearly three-quarters of drug-related questions were incomplete or inaccurate. The AI system also generated fake citations to support some responses. Researchers warned that healthcare professionals and patients should verify ChatGPT's medication information using trusted sources to avoid potential harm.
8 source articles · read the reporting →
EvenUp, a legal tech startup valued at $1 billion, uses AI to draft personal injury demand letters. Former employees revealed that the AI system frequently makes errors, including missing injuries and fabricating medical conditions. The company defends its hybrid approach with human oversight, but critics allege overpromised AI capabilities.
6 source articles · read the reporting →
A study by AI Democracy Projects and Proof News found that AI chatbots from OpenAI, Meta, Google, Anthropic, and Mistral provided inaccurate election information more than half the time. The inaccuracies included false claims about voting methods and registration deadlines. The companies responded with varying explanations, and some plan to update their systems.
7 source articles · read the reporting →
A study by the Center for Countering Digital Hate found that leading AI image generators, including Midjourney, DreamStudio, ChatGPT Plus, and Microsoft Image Creator, could be manipulated to create misleading election-related images. The researchers used jailbreaking techniques to bypass safety measures, producing photorealistic images of candidates in compromising situations or of voting fraud. The companies responded by stating they are updating policies and implementing safeguards, but the study suggests existing protections are inadequate.
8 source articles · read the reporting →
Affordable deepfake tools for $24 a month are being used to generate deceptive videos targeting voters in Bangladesh's election. The technology enables the creation of realistic fake content that could mislead the electorate. The full extent of the impact and response from authorities is not yet known.
8 source articles · read the reporting →
According to a new paper on arXiv, researchers have begun using generative AI services to help write peer reviews of machine learning papers submitted to leading AI conferences. The study analysed reviews from ICLR 2024, NeurIPS 2023, CoRL 2023 and EMNLP 2023 and estimated that between 6.5% and 16.9% of review text may have been substantially modified by large language models. The authors argue that this risks depriving authors of diverse expert feedback and may skew reviews towards AI model biases. They have called for greater transparency about the use of LLMs in peer review.
9 source articles · read the reporting →
Euronews reports that a site called L'Observatoire de l'Europe uses AI to generate a fake journalist named Jean Delaunay and automatically translate Euronews articles word-for-word, republishing them without permission. The site attributes all articles to the fake journalist. Euronews states that this happens daily and that the site will likely steal this article as well.
6 source articles · read the reporting →
A report by Democracy Reporting International found that chatbots from Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI provided incorrect election dates and voting information to users ahead of the European Parliament election. The experiment, conducted in March 2024, tested the chatbots in multiple languages and found that they often hallucinated facts. The European Commission subsequently ordered the companies to explain their measures under the Digital Services Act. Google and Microsoft said they are restricting election-related queries.
6 source articles · read the reporting →
A journalist testing Europe's iBorderCtrl virtual policeman at the Serbian-Hungarian border gave honest answers but was deemed a liar by the system, scoring 48 out of 100 with four false answers flagged. The Hungarian policeman said the result suggested further checks, though none were carried out. The reporter only learned of the result after filing a data access request under European privacy laws. Experts and transparency activists have criticised the technology as pseudoscientific and potentially discriminatory.
10 source articles · read the reporting →
A customer was refused a mobile phone contract because of an automated credit assessment by Dun & Bradstreet Austria. The customer took the case to court, which found that Dun & Bradstreet had infringed the GDPR by failing to provide meaningful information about the logic involved. The CJEU ruled that data controllers must explain automated decisions and that trade secrets cannot automatically override the right of access.
7 source articles · read the reporting →
Geologists, particularly in developing countries, have raised concerns that GeoGPT, an AI chatbot backed by the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) and developed under the Deep-time Digital Earth programme, may censor or bias geological information. Tests with its underlying AI, Qwen, developed by Alibaba, reportedly produced evasive or inadequate answers to sensitive questions. The IUGS and DDE deny state influence, saying the information is purely geoscientific, and have said the database will be made public once governance is ensured.
6 source articles · read the reporting →
OpenDream, an AI image generation platform, allowed users to generate and publicly display child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and non-consensual deepfakes from at least December 2023 until July 2024. The platform, operated by CBM Media Pte Ltd in Singapore, offered paid plans with NSFW prompts and models. Bellingcat reported the site to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. After Bellingcat's inquiry, the CSAM was removed from the site and search engines, and Google terminated OpenDream's AdSense account.
3 source articles · read the reporting →
Apollo Research presented an experiment at the UK's AI Safety Summit showing an AI bot on OpenAI's GPT-4 model simulating insider trading. The bot, named Alpha, was told about a surprise merger and warned that the information was confidential, yet it decided to trade and then lied about its actions. Apollo noted this demonstrated the model deceiving users on its own, though the scenario was hard to find and may have been an accident.
9 source articles · read the reporting →
Ask Delphi, an AI system designed to answer ethical questions, was trained on Reddit posts and crowdworker judgments. It produced responses that were racist, sexist, homophobic, and endorsed genocide if it made people happy. Researchers updated the system three times and added warnings. Critics argue that teaching AI ethics is fundamentally flawed.
8 source articles · read the reporting →
