The record

Where automated decisions went wrong

Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.

Reports people file about their own experience are not shown here and never will be without their agreement. Tell us what happened to you.

Clear

92 incidents closest to “Robin Legal Intelligence Platform” · matched on meaning · public reporting

Dutch police predictive policing project in Roermond faces discrimination allegations

Amnesty International's report alleges that the Dutch police's Sensing predictive policing project in Roermond uses algorithms that result in automated discrimination and mass surveillance. The system assesses crime risk for individuals and locations, potentially targeting marginalized communities. The report calls for accountability and human rights safeguards.

Company involved
Dutch police
AI system involved
Sensing project

10 source articles · read the reporting →

Finnish recruitment company Digital Minds used AI to analyze job applicants' messages, prompting data protection investigation

Digital Minds, a Finnish recruitment company founded by psychologists, used IBM Watson AI to analyze job applicants' social media and email messages for personality assessments. The company obtained written consent but the Finnish Data Protection Ombudsman launched an investigation, suspecting violations of data protection laws and the secrecy of correspondence. The service was used on fewer than ten applicants and has been paused pending the investigation.

Company involved
Digital Minds
AI system involved
IBM Watson

9 source articles · read the reporting →

Momus Analytics' jury-selection algorithm criticised for racial bias

Momus Analytics, a legal technology company, uses machine learning to rank potential jurors for attorneys. Experts and researchers who reviewed the company's patent application say the algorithm relies on demographic characteristics such as race, which may violate constitutional prohibitions against discriminatory jury selection. The company claims its software has helped secure verdicts worth over $940 million, but did not respond to requests for comment.

Company involved
Momus Analytics
AI system involved
Momus

9 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-DLCQWL4 Nov 2024

CanLII sues Caseway AI for scraping legal database

The Canadian Legal Information Institute (CanLII) has filed a lawsuit in British Columbia Supreme Court against Caseway AI, alleging that the company's AI chatbot scraped approximately 3.5 million records from CanLII's database in bulk, violating its terms of service and copyright. CanLII claims it adds value to public court records through hyperlinks and corrections, which it says constitute protected copyrighted work. Caseway AI argues the information is public and accessible elsewhere, and that it did not use CanLII's enhancements. The lawsuit was settled in March 2026, with terms undisclosed.

Company involved
Canadian Legal Information Institute (CanLII)
AI system involved
Caseway

5 source articles · read the reporting →

Judge rules police search using Flock was mass surveillance

A judge ruled that a police search using Flock's automated license plate readers constituted a form of mass surveillance. The ruling concerns the deployment of the AI-based camera system by law enforcement, which the court found to be an invasive surveillance practice. No further details of the case were provided in the article.

AI system involved
Flock

4 source articles · read the reporting →

Wisconsin court used secret COMPAS algorithm to sentence Loomis to harsher term

In Loomis v. Wisconsin, a judge used a COMPAS risk score from Northpointe to sentence a defendant to a harsher punishment. The algorithm was kept secret as a trade secret, preventing the defendant from challenging its accuracy. The Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld the sentence, ruling that the score was only one part of the rationale. The case raises concerns about due process and the use of secret algorithms in criminal sentencing.

Company involved
State of Wisconsin
AI system involved
COMPAS

10 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-M3PW5F27 Aug 2026

Thomas Raynard James v. Detective Kevin Conley, et al. (S.D. Florida): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Bar Referral

AI generated hallucinated content in a court filing, affecting the legal process and the lawyers who filed it.

1 source article · read the reporting →

Virginia crime lab faces first challenge to secret DNA algorithm

A defendant in an armed-robbery case in Fairfax County is challenging a secret algorithm used by the Virginia crime lab to interpret DNA evidence. The lab could not make a conventional match because skin-cell DNA on the victim's shirt was mixed with DNA from too many people; the algorithm identified the defendant as a contributor. The defendant is seeking to scrutinise the algorithm, reportedly for the first time.

Company involved
Virginia crime lab

10 source articles · read the reporting →

Canadian news outlets sue OpenAI over alleged copyright infringement in training ChatGPT

A coalition of major Canadian news outlets, including the Toronto Star, Postmedia, and CBC, is suing OpenAI, alleging that the company illegally used their copyrighted articles to train its ChatGPT chatbot. The lawsuit, filed in Canada, seeks punitive damages and an injunction to stop OpenAI from using their content. OpenAI has defended its practices, stating that its models are trained on publicly available data and that it offers publishers ways to opt out.

Company involved
OpenAI
AI system involved
ChatGPT

6 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-QJLLJJ14 Jul 2026

In re Rosslyn2016, LLC, et al. (S.D. Texas (Bankruptcy)): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, CLE on generative AI; Civil Contempt;…

The AI generated fabricated legal citations that were submitted to the bankruptcy court.

1 source article · read the reporting →

New Jersey court rules police must disclose facial recognition algorithms used to identify defendant

Francisco Arteaga was charged with armed robbery after a facial recognition search by the New York Police Department identified him as a possible match. The New Jersey police used this match to obtain witness identifications. Arteaga requested information about the facial recognition software, including its source code and error rate, but the trial court denied his request. The New Jersey appellate court ruled that the prosecution must disclose the algorithms, citing due process and the Brady rule.

Company involved
New Jersey Police

7 source articles · read the reporting →

LINAGORA closes Lucie 7B after user mockery

LINAGORA, a French open-source software company, launched a beta version of its large language model Lucie 7B. The model was intended to be a transparent and ethical alternative to big tech AI. However, after users tested it and highlighted its shortcomings, the model was mocked online. LINAGORA subsequently closed the platform to address the issues and collect more data.

Company involved
LINAGORA
AI system involved
Lucie 7B

6 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-L8981D29 Jan 2025

DeepSeek exposed user data via open ClickHouse database

Cloud security firm Wiz discovered a ClickHouse database belonging to DeepSeek that was open to the internet without authentication, containing over a million lines of logs with chat histories, secret keys and backend details. Wiz disclosed the breach to DeepSeek, which promptly locked down the database. The incident highlights security risks in rapidly deploying AI services.

Company involved
DeepSeek
AI system involved
DeepSeek-R1

5 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-G32OV813 Nov 2023

Brazilian judge investigated for AI-generated ruling errors

Brazilian authorities are investigating federal judge Jefferson Rodrigues after he published a ruling that contained incorrect legal citations and precedents, which he attributed to the use of AI tool ChatGPT. The National Justice Council summoned the judge to explain the errors, which included wrongly attributing past decisions to the Superior Court of Justice. Rodrigues described the mistakes as a "mere mistake" caused by work overload. This is reported as the first such case in Brazil.

Company involved
Federal judiciary of Brazil
AI system involved
ChatGPT

8 source articles · read the reporting →

IRCC uses AI triage for Temporary Resident Visa applications

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) uses an AI system called Advanced Analytics to triage Temporary Resident Visa applications from India and China. The system categorizes applications into tiers, with Tier 1 approved automatically and others sent to human officers. Critics allege the system lacks transparency and may introduce bias, leading to visa refusals without clear rationale. The author, a Canadian immigration lawyer, is filing Federal Court cases on behalf of clients affected by refusals.

Company involved
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC)
AI system involved
Advanced Analytics Triage of Overseas Temporary Resident Visa Applications

10 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-2ABL3N30 Nov 2023

Bavarian police test Palantir data mining with real personal data

The Bavarian State Criminal Police Office (LKA) has been testing Palantir's data mining software, called VeRa, with real personal data for months. The Bavarian data protection commissioner only learned of the test through a media inquiry and has announced a review. The Interior Ministry claims the test is lawful under current law, but critics argue a legal basis is missing.

Company involved
Bayerisches Landeskriminalamt
AI system involved
VeRa

7 source articles · read the reporting →

BC Tribunal Confirms Companies Remain Liable for AI Chatbot-Created Information - Lexology

The AI chatbot provided inaccurate information to a user.

1 source article · read the reporting →

FTC settles with DoNotPay over deceptive AI lawyer claims

The FTC took action against DoNotPay, a company that claimed to offer an AI service that was 'the world's first robot lawyer.' The company promised to generate legal documents and replace human lawyers, but the FTC alleged it failed to test its AI output and did not hire any attorneys. DoNotPay agreed to a settlement requiring it to pay $193,000 and notify consumers about the limitations of its service.

Company involved
DoNotPay
AI system involved
DoNotPay

7 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-QKGYYS5 Feb 2024

Philadelphia Sheriff's campaign admits AI-generated fake news headlines

The reelection campaign of Philadelphia Sheriff Rochelle Bilal posted 31 fabricated news articles on its website, attributing them to local news outlets. The campaign acknowledged that an outside consultant used ChatGPT to generate the fake headlines, which were based on talking points provided by the campaign. The articles were removed after an Inquirer investigation raised questions about their authenticity.

Company involved
Friends of Rochelle Bilal
AI system involved
ChatGPT

8 source articles · read the reporting →

Leonardo AI misused to create nonconsensual explicit images of celebrities

Leonardo AI, an AI image-generating platform backed by Samsung, has been misused to create nonconsensual explicit images of celebrities. The platform allows users to generate images using user-generated Stable Diffusion models. Users bypassed ethical guardrails by misspelling celebrity names and using sexually suggestive terms. The misuse was reported by 404 Media.

Company involved
Leonardo AI
AI system involved
Leonardo AI

5 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-MCOWG76 May 2025

California judge sanctions law firms for using AI to generate fake legal citations

Two law firms submitted a supplemental brief containing fake legal citations generated by AI systems including Google Gemini and Westlaw's CoCounsel. Judge Michael Wilner imposed $31,000 in sanctions after discovering the citations were fabricated. The lawyers admitted using AI without proper review or disclosure.

Company involved
K&L Gates
AI system involved
Google Gemini, Westlaw Precision with CoCounsel

5 source articles · read the reporting →

OpenAI and Anthropic ignore robots.txt to scrape web content for training data

OpenAI and Anthropic have been found to be ignoring or circumventing the robots.txt rule that prevents automated scraping of websites, according to a person with knowledge of TollBit's analytics. The AI companies are bypassing blocks to their web crawlers GPTBot and ClaudeBot to retrieve all content from publishers' websites for model training. The practice undermines the long-standing web standard and raises concerns about copyright infringement.

Company involved
OpenAI, Anthropic
AI system involved
ChatGPT, Claude

10 source articles · read the reporting →

Center for Investigative Reporting Sues OpenAI, Microsoft Over Copyright

The Center for Investigative Reporting, publisher of Mother Jones and Reveal, has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft in federal court, alleging the companies used its copyrighted articles without permission or compensation to train their AI products. The nonprofit argues that the AI-generated summaries of its stories threaten journalism and violate the Copyright Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Company involved
OpenAI and Microsoft

6 source articles · read the reporting →

Prosecraft shut down after using authors' books without consent for AI analytics

Prosecraft, a fiction analytics site, used the full text of over 25,000 books without author consent to train its AI algorithms and provide writing statistics. Authors protested on social media, demanding removal of their works. The developer, Benji Smith, subsequently shut down the site and wrote a blog post explaining his actions.

Company involved
Prosecraft
AI system involved
Prosecraft

10 source articles · read the reporting →

← Newerpage 3 of 4Older →