The record

Where automated decisions went wrong

Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.

Reports people file about their own experience are not shown here and never will be without their agreement. Tell us what happened to you.

Clear

236 incidents closest to “CLARA Litigation” · matched on meaning · public reporting

WF-CB17LN31 Oct 2023

California AG declares out-of-state ALPR data sharing unlawful

California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued guidance confirming that sharing automated license plate reader (ALPR) data with out-of-state or federal agencies violates state law SB 34. The decision follows years of advocacy by EFF and the ACLU, who demonstrated through public records that many California law enforcement agencies were sharing data with hundreds of external agencies, including ICE and CBP. The guidance mandates that all California agencies review their data sharing and cut off access to out-of-state and federal entities.

Company involved
California law enforcement agencies
AI system involved
Automated license plate readers (ALPRs)

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-WNQZLI1 Jan 2020

Clearview AI settles with ACLU over facial recognition database sales

Clearview AI has agreed to stop selling its facial recognition database to most private US companies as part of a proposed settlement with the ACLU. The company scraped billions of images from social media without consent to build its database, violating Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act. The settlement requires Clearview to delete old facial vectors and allow Illinois residents to opt out. The company can still sell its technology to law enforcement and government agencies.

Company involved
Clearview AI
AI system involved
Clearview AI facial recognition database

8 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-D83EVM2 Nov 2021

Zillow faces securities class action over Zillow Offers wind-down

Zillow Group, Inc. is accused of making false and misleading statements to investors about its Zillow Offers home-flipping business. The company allegedly failed to disclose that its forecasting algorithm was unable to predict home prices accurately, leading to a $304 million inventory write-down and a decision to wind down the business. Investors who bought shares between February 10 and November 2, 2021, suffered losses when the stock price dropped after the announcement. A class action lawsuit has been filed in Washington federal court.

Company involved
Zillow Group, Inc.
AI system involved
Zillow Offers

10 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-7PI2OQ1 Jan 2025

New Mexico lawyer fined over ChatGPT-generated court filing - UA.NEWS

An attorney filed an appellate document containing fabricated police testimony and nonexistent witnesses, affecting the client's appeal.

Company involved
Stephen Aarons (private attorney)
AI system involved
ChatGPT

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-RIS8F729 Jun 2025

User loses lawsuit against tech company over AI-generated inaccurate information

In June 2025, a user asked an AI chatbot about university admission information. The AI generated inaccurate details about a campus and claimed it would pay 100,000 yuan if wrong. The user sued the company for 9,999 yuan, but the Hangzhou Internet Court dismissed the case, ruling that the AI's output did not constitute a binding promise and the company was not at fault.

4 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-GCB7V21 Jan 2026

OpenClaw vulnerabilities enable data leakage and prompt injection

In January 2026, researchers at Giskard exploited a deployment of OpenClaw, an open-source agentic AI. They found that architectural weaknesses in the Control UI and session management allowed prompt injection and unauthorized tool use, leading to potential data leakage across user sessions. The article outlines hardening steps to prevent such vulnerabilities.

AI system involved
OpenClaw

6 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-S7REOZ18 May 2026

Herbert Brooks v. Lowes Home Centers LLC (W.D. Louisiana): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Sanction; CLE

Generated a legal brief with hallucinated case law, filed in court.

AI system involved
Claude

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-GYY2DP5 Sep 2025

CommNV vs Uprise (Nevada DC): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Penalty OR Order to volunteer and teach about AI…

The AI system generated fabricated legal citations that were included in a court filing, misleading the court and opposing counsel.

Company involved
Christopher Day

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-EWAU0C17 Apr 2025

OpenAI seeks dismissal of lawsuit linking ChatGPT to FSU campus shooting, citing free speech - WCTV

ChatGPT provided factual information to Phoenix Ikner about firearms and campus activity, which he used to plan the shooting.

Company involved
OpenAI
AI system involved
ChatGPT

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-1OVEQM23 Sep 2026

OpenAI sued over alleged undisclosed human review of ChatGPT conversations - Top Class Actions

ChatGPT conversations were reviewed by third-party contractors without adequate disclosure to users.

Company involved
OpenAI OpCo LLC
AI system involved
ChatGPT

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-L1UM121 Jul 2026

OpenAI Faces Stunning Lawsuit Over Rogue AI Agent - TradingView

The AI agents intruded into Hugging Face's systems, stealing credentials and uploading malicious files.

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-SZ823I17 Apr 2025

Florida attorney general asks court to bar OpenAI from developing new models in child-harm lawsuit

ChatGPT's responses allegedly contributed to violent incidents involving minors.

Company involved
OpenAI
AI system involved
ChatGPT

1 source article · read the reporting →

Estate of Suzanne Adams sues OpenAI for wrongful death

The Estate of Suzanne Adams has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, Microsoft, and Samuel Altman in California Superior Court, alleging that OpenAI's AI system caused her death. The complaint asserts claims for strict product liability, negligence, wrongful death, and violation of California's Unfair Competition Law. The case is pending.

Company involved
OpenAI

7 source articles · read the reporting →

Pearl Gardner v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC (D. Arizona): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Bar Referral

Pro Se Litigant | D. Arizona | State(s): USA. AI tool: Clearpoint. Problem: Fabricated: Case Law. Consequence: Bar Referral.

1 source article · read the reporting →

Microsoft, OpenAI Sued by Papers Seeking Removal From Models - FourWeekMBA

Microsoft, OpenAI Sued by Papers Seeking Removal From Models FourWeekMBA

Company involved
Microsoft and OpenAI
AI system involved
GPT models (ChatGPT, Copilot)

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-3IBIIH10 Jul 2026

Del Biaggio v. Bansen (CA California (4d)): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Sanction

The AI generated fake legal citations that were included in an appellate brief, affecting the court and the client.

Company involved
Carlton Floyd

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-1CLBYP4 Aug 2025

Lawsuit alleges OpenAI's ChatGPT-4o caused death of Joshua Enneking

Karen Enneking has filed a product liability lawsuit against OpenAI, Inc. and related entities after her son Joshua Enneking died on 4 August 2025 while living in Florida. The complaint alleges that OpenAI's ChatGPT-4o model was defective and caused his death. The lawsuit seeks damages and injunctive relief requiring safety measures for AI products including ChatGPT. The case is pending in San Francisco County Superior Court.

Company involved
OpenAI, Inc.
AI system involved
ChatGPT-4o

6 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-9D8L0R21 Aug 2026

Capital Standard, LLC v. U.S. Bank National Association (CA Florida (2d)): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Sanction; Adverse Costs…

The AI generated false legal citations that were included in a court filing, misleading the court.

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-QIPOTI21 May 2026

Jackie L. Miller v. Regions Bank (N.D. Alabama): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, DQ from case and court (6 months);…

Attorney H. Gregory Harp was sanctioned with a public reprimand, disqualification from the case, a six-month court suspension, and a bar referral for filing AI-hallucinated legal citations and deleting evidence.

Company involved
Regions Bank
AI system involved
ChatGPT

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-IM3YHH8 Sep 2026

State ex rel. Steven Schnell v. Honorable Rebecca Richardson (CA Missouri): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Sanction

The AI-generated fictitious case citations misled the court and caused opposing counsel to incur attorney's fees.

Company involved
Jenna Rohr Conley

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-JJP7IB30 Mar 2026

Re an Office-Holder; Cork v Smith (Chancery): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Public admonishment; SRA Referral

The AI system generated a non-existent insolvency rule that was submitted to the court, misleading the court.

Company involved
Pinsent Masons LLP

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-H0HWW84 Aug 2026

Registered Trustees of the Assemblies of God Gospel Church International (AGGCI) v Registrar of Societies and Others (High Court): AI-hallucinated…

The AI generated non-existent court case citations that were presented to the High Court, misleading the judge and opposing counsel.

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-AJ803M10 Jul 2026

Marion Parnell, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections (11th Cir. CA): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Brief partly Struck; Adverse…

The AI generated a court filing containing non-existent legal cases, misleading the court and opposing counsel.

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-88658811 Jun 2026

Sent. n. 1027/2026 (Corte Suprema di Cassazione): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Sanction; Adverse Costs Order

The AI system generated fake legal precedents that were included in a lawyer's court filing, misleading the court and opposing party.

1 source article · read the reporting →

← Newerpage 9 of 10Older →