Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.
Reports people file about their own experience are not shown here and never will be without their agreement. Tell us what happened to you.
238 incidents closest to “CoCounsel Legal” · matched on meaning · public reporting
Police wrongfully accused a woman of theft based on Flock camera surveillance of her vehicle.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The system captured images of vehicles and license plates, and the county failed to release them to a public records requester.
1 source article · read the reporting →
An attorney filed an appellate document containing fabricated police testimony and nonexistent witnesses, affecting the client's appeal.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The AI generated fabricated witness testimony and witnesses that were included in a legal brief for a murder conviction appeal, affecting the defendant's case.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The Federal Court rejected the refugee claimants' appeal due to AI-generated fake legal arguments.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Generated a legal brief with hallucinated case law, filed in court.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The AI system generated fabricated legal citations that were included in a court filing, misleading the court and opposing counsel.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The system provided 30 days of location data on the driver's vehicle, which led to a traffic stop and search.
1 source article · read the reporting →
ChatGPT conversations were reviewed by third-party contractors without adequate disclosure to users.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The smart glasses recorded bystanders without their consent and sent the footage to Meta for AI training.
1 source article · read the reporting →
A class action, settled for $30 million, alleged that Equifax automatically rejected consumers' disputes of hard inquiries on their credit reports, sending a form letter instead of investigating.
1 source article · read the reporting →
ChatGPT's responses allegedly contributed to violent incidents involving minors.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Identified Christopher Gatlin as a suspect in an assault, leading to his arrest and 17 months in jail.
1 source article · read the reporting →
In Scott v. Illinois Human Rights Commission, an Illinois Appellate Court case, a lawyer's filings contained fictitious legal citations and misquoted statutes. The court fined the lawyer $15,000 and referred the matter to the bar.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Pro Se Litigant | D. Arizona | State(s): USA. AI tool: Clearpoint. Problem: Fabricated: Case Law. Consequence: Bar Referral.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The system captured and stored license plate data and vehicle movements of Boulder residents and commuters, making it searchable by law enforcement without a warrant.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The AI generated fake legal citations that were included in an appellate brief, affecting the court and the client.
1 source article · read the reporting →
In Tiekert v. Village of Mamaroneck in the Southern District of New York, the court found that the plaintiff's lawyer filed briefs containing non-existent quotations and misrepresented authorities. In a filing to the court, the lawyer said ChatGPT had been used to assist with legal research. On September 14, 2026, the court imposed Rule 11 sanctions: $500 payable to the court and two New York continuing legal education credits in ethics on the use of AI.
2 source articles · read the reporting →
The AI generated false legal citations that were included in a court filing, misleading the court.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Attorney H. Gregory Harp was sanctioned with a public reprimand, disqualification from the case, a six-month court suspension, and a bar referral for filing AI-hallucinated legal citations and deleting evidence.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The AI-generated fictitious case citations misled the court and caused opposing counsel to incur attorney's fees.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The AI system generated a non-existent insolvency rule that was submitted to the court, misleading the court.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The AI generated non-existent court case citations that were presented to the High Court, misleading the judge and opposing counsel.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The AI generated a court filing containing non-existent legal cases, misleading the court and opposing counsel.
1 source article · read the reporting →
