The record

Where automated decisions went wrong

Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.

Reports people file about their own experience are not shown here and never will be without their agreement. Tell us what happened to you.

Clear

3 incidents involving Honorlock · search all text for “Honorlock” instead · public reporting

WF-M7MNAV1 Feb 2022

Broward College student flagged by Honorlock and accused of cheating

A 17-year-old Black student at Broward College was flagged by Honorlock, a remote proctoring system, during an online biology exam in February 2022. Her professor reviewed the recording and accused her of academic dishonesty for looking down and away from the screen; the college found her responsible for noncompliance and gave her a zero and a warning. The student says she was only thinking and fidgeting, and the article reports that the video is ambiguous. Honorlock says it does not definitively identify cheaters and the final decision rests with the school.

Company involved
Broward College
AI system involved
Honorlock

2 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-701YEA11 Mar 2021

UW-Madison disables Honorlock after skin tone recognition failure

The University of Wisconsin-Madison disabled the exam pause feature of its Honorlock anti-cheating software in March 2021 after three students complained that the software failed to recognize their darker skin tones and paused their exams. The software, used since online classes began, automatically pauses exams when it cannot detect facial features. Honorlock denied the issue was related to skin tone, attributing it to students looking away from their webcams. The university responded by disabling the feature.

Company involved
University of Wisconsin-Madison
AI system involved
Honorlock

10 source articles · read the reporting →

Privacy group files complaint against proctoring companies over AI surveillance

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) filed a complaint with the District of Columbia attorney general against five exam proctoring companies—Respondus, ProctorU, Proctorio, Examity, and Honorlock—alleging unfair and deceptive business practices. The companies are accused of using opaque AI algorithms to flag cheating and collecting excessive biometric data from students. Students have reported that the facial recognition software fails to detect dark skin tones, preventing them from taking exams. EPIC has also sent demand letters threatening civil suits if the companies do not stop their practices.

Company involved
Proctorio, Respondus, ProctorU, Examity, Honorlock

10 source articles · read the reporting →