The record

Where automated decisions went wrong

Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.

Reports people file about their own experience are not shown here and never will be without their agreement. Tell us what happened to you.

Clear

6 incidents involving ShotSpotter · search all text for “ShotSpotter” instead · public reporting

WF-MJJJVQ1 Jan 2023

Durham's ShotSpotter fails to detect two deadly shootings

ShotSpotter, a gunshot detection system piloted by the Durham Police Department, failed to detect two fatal shootings in February 2023, as well as a New Year's Day shooting that injured five. The system, which uses sensors and human review to alert police, did not send alerts for these incidents within its three-square-mile coverage area. The company stated it investigated and provided a report to the police, while a city official defended the pilot, noting it is still early in the year-long trial. Community concerns have been raised about increased police presence and potential racial profiling.

Company involved
Durham Police Department
AI system involved
ShotSpotter

5 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-KV5JH28 Jul 2022

ShotSpotter's defamation suit against Vice Media dismissed by Delaware court

ShotSpotter, the company behind the AI gunshot detection system, sued Vice Media for defamation over articles alleging it alters evidence at police request. The Delaware Superior Court dismissed the lawsuit, finding the statements were substantially true or opinion. Vice Media incurred legal costs defending itself, as Delaware's anti-SLAPP law does not allow recovery of fees in this case.

Company involved
ShotSpotter
AI system involved
ShotSpotter

9 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-YGX9567 Nov 2021

ShotSpotter held in contempt over refusal to release documents

ShotSpotter, a gunshot-detection technology company, was held in contempt of court after refusing to release documents about how it assesses gunshot alerts. The case stems from a November 2021 DUI arrest in Chicago, where the defence alleges the police pulled the driver over solely based on a ShotSpotter alert. Rather than comply with a subpoena from the Cook County Public Defender Office, ShotSpotter's attorney requested the contempt order to enable an appeal. The defence sought materials on analyst qualifications, alert reclassifications, and sensor accuracy data.

Company involved
ShotSpotter
AI system involved
ShotSpotter

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-V9TTGF1 Mar 2021

Chicago Police Department's ShotSpotter Deployment Disproportionately Targets Black Neighborhoods

The Chicago Police Department and other cities have deployed ShotSpotter, a gunshot-detection system, almost exclusively in Black and brown neighborhoods. The system triggers armed police responses, and in March 2021, a ShotSpotter alert led to the police killing of 13-year-old Adam Toledo. Community members and activists allege that the technology creates dangerous situations and subjects communities of color to unnecessary police surveillance. ShotSpotter defends its placement based on historical gunfire data.

Company involved
Chicago Police Department
AI system involved
ShotSpotter

4 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-78F5YG31 May 2020

Chicago Police Used Altered ShotSpotter Evidence in Murder Case

In May 2020, ShotSpotter sensors detected a sound in Chicago and initially classified it as a firework. After police requested re-analysis, a ShotSpotter analyst manually reclassified the sound as a gunshot. The altered evidence was used to charge Michael Williams with murder. Williams' public defender filed a motion challenging the evidence's validity, and prosecutors subsequently withdrew the ShotSpotter evidence.

Company involved
Chicago Police Department
AI system involved
ShotSpotter

3 source articles · read the reporting →

Chicago class action challenges ShotSpotter's discriminatory stop-and-frisk deployments

ShotSpotter, a gunshot detection system used by the Chicago Police Department, generates alerts that lead to police deployments and stop-and-frisk stops. Analyses show over 90% of alerts are unfounded, and the system is deployed only in predominantly Black and Latinx districts. A class-action lawsuit against the City of Chicago alleges the system fuels unconstitutional and discriminatory policing, including false accusations against individuals like Michael Williams.

Company involved
City of Chicago
AI system involved
ShotSpotter

7 source articles · read the reporting →