Herbert Brooks v. Lowes Home Centers LLC (W.D. Louisiana): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Sanction; CLE
Generated a legal brief with hallucinated case law, filed in court.
- AI system
- Claude
Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.
Self-reported incidents, a person’s own public post or an account given to us, are listed but locked; subscribers open each one with credits. Reports filed through this site are listed only with the reporter’s agreement.
Press reportingSelf-reported: a person’s own public post · 10 creditsSelf-reported: told to us directly · 25 credits
Generated a legal brief with hallucinated case law, filed in court.
The AI generated fabricated case law that was submitted to the court, affecting the legal proceedings.
The lawyer submitted AI-generated court documents containing false citations and quotes, harming his client's discrimination case.
The AI generated nonexistent case citations that were filed in court, misleading the court and opposing counsel.
The AI generated fabricated legal citations that were included in a court filing, affecting the defendant's legal representation and the court's resources.
AI-generated fake court precedents were included in a legal appeal, leading to sanctions against the litigant for bad-faith litigation.
The AI system generated hallucinated content that was submitted in a court filing, potentially misleading the court.
The father's court filing contained AI-generated fake case citations, leading to a costs order against him.
The system generated fabricated legal citations and quotes in a court filing, misleading the court and opposing counsel.
An AI tool generated fictitious legal citations that the appellant included in his appellate brief.
Automated driving system controlled vehicle braking and acceleration, leading to rear-end collisions with other road users
The AI-generated court filing contained fabricated case law, leading to a monetary sanction against the party represented by the lawyer.
The AI generated fabricated legal citations that the claimant submitted to the tribunal, resulting in a costs order against the claimant.
The deepfake video convinced the victim to invest in a fraudulent scheme, leading to financial loss.
The AI system generated false legal citations that were included in a court filing, misleading the court and opposing counsel.
Regulatory record (NHTSA investigation). Their database holds the crashes it covers, not the investigation itself: AIAAIC-1472 / AIAAIC-1471 (BlueCruise fatal crashes)
The system identified an innocent man as a suspect, leading to his arrest for attempting to solicit a child
The AI system generated fictitious legal citations in a summary judgment motion, misleading the court and opposing counsel.
The AI generated fabricated legal citations in a court filing, misleading the court and opposing counsel.
The AI system generated fabricated case citations and quotations that were included in a legal brief, leading to a monetary sanction against the lawyer.
ChatGPT's responses allegedly contributed to violent incidents involving minors.
The AI generated fabricated case law that was included in a court filing, misleading the court and resulting in sanctions against the litigant.
The AI generated hallucinated legal citations that were filed in court, misleading the court and opposing counsel.
The AI tool generated fictitious case law citations that were included in a court filing, affecting the plaintiff and the court.
Each incident is written from the reporting or the account it cites. A report is an allegation, not a finding.