Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.
Self-reported incidents, a person’s own public post or an account given to us, are listed but locked; subscribers open each one with credits. Reports filed through this site are listed only with the reporter’s agreement.
Press reportingSelf-reported: a person’s own public post · 10 creditsSelf-reported: told to us directly · 25 credits
The system collected license plate data on vehicles, and the sergeant accessed it without a legitimate law enforcement purpose.
The system allowed unauthorized searches of license plate data, affecting individuals whose plates were queried.
Microsoft, OpenAI Sued by Papers Seeking Removal From Models FourWeekMBA
Kingsville police officer resigns after investigation into alleged Flock camera misuse Yahoo
AI-generated court filing contained fabricated case law, affecting the defendant.
Generated fabricated case law in a legal complaint, causing the court to deny an emergency injunction against the City of Parkersburg.
The AI generated fake legal citations that were included in a court filing, potentially harming the plaintiff's case.
The AI generated nonexistent legal citations that were included in a court filing, causing the court to strike them from the appellant's brief.
The AI generated fabricated legal citations that were presented to the court, affecting the defendants and the judicial process.
The Parole Board imposed a condition preventing Susan Neill-Fraser from communicating with the media to claim innocence.
Pro Se Litigant | D. Arizona | State(s): USA. AI tool: Clearpoint. Problem: Fabricated: Case Law. Consequence: Bar Referral.
The AI system generated hallucinated legal citations in court filings, causing the court to strike the briefs of both plaintiff and defendant.
The AI generated fake legal citations that were included in an appellate brief, misleading the court and the opposing party.
The AI generated fake legal citations that were filed in court, wasting the court's and opposing party's time and resources.
The AI generated fabricated case law in the second defendant's court submissions.
AI generated fabricated case law citations that were included in a court filing, potentially misleading the court in Russell v. Mells.
The AI generated fake case citations that were included in a court filing, misleading the court and opposing counsel.
The AI generated fabricated legal citations that were submitted to the court, affecting the defendant and the judicial process.
The AI generated fabricated case law and quotes that were included in a court filing, affecting the plaintiffs and the judicial process.
The AI-generated fictitious citation was submitted in a motion to unseal, affecting the defendant's legal proceedings.
The AI-generated court filing contained false information, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff's case with prejudice.
Waymo's automated driving system exhibited unexpected behavior during driving.
The AI-generated victim impact statement influenced the judge's sentencing of Gabriel Paul Horcasitas.
The New Mexico Supreme Court found a lawyer in contempt, removed him from a murder appeal case, and ordered him to pay $5,000 for filing a brief containing AI-fabricated witnesses and testimony.
Each incident is written from the reporting or the account it cites. A report is an allegation, not a finding.
