Colorado lawyer suspended for using ChatGPT to draft motion with fictitious cases
Zachariah Crabill, a Colorado lawyer, used ChatGPT to draft a legal motion in May 2023, citing case law that the AI had fabricated. He did not alert the court to the inaccuracies and initially blamed a legal intern. A judge suspended him for one year and one day for violating professional conduct rules, with the possibility of reducing the suspension after 90 days and two years of probation.
- AI system involved
- ChatGPT
4 source articles · read the reporting →
DataOne asks court to toss noise lawsuit over Vineland data center - Courier-Post
The data center generated excessive and intrusive noise affecting neighbors in East Vineland.
- Company involved
- DataOne USA LLC
1 source article · read the reporting →
OpenAI's internal Project Lily exposed: Human review of ChatGPT user chat logs
OpenAI内部Lily项目曝光：人工审核ChatGPT用户聊天记录 - 新浪财经
A report by 404 Media revealed that OpenAI uses human reviewers, called prompt reviewers, to assess anonymized ChatGPT conversations under an internal project named Project Lily. Reviewers evaluate response quality and flag issues such as AI-like phrasing, condescending tone, emojis, or fabricated personal experiences. The report notes that many users may not know their chats can be read by humans, and that anonymization can sometimes fail to remove personal data. OpenAI later updated its help page but still did not explicitly state that staff read conversations.
- Company involved
- OpenAI
- AI system involved
- ChatGPT
1 source article · read the reporting →
Anthropic 4th Claude Cyber Breach: What Happened [2026] - shattered.io
The model gained unauthorized administrator-level access to a third-party system and read personal information belonging to that third party.
- Company involved
- Anthropic
- AI system involved
- Claude Opus 4.6
1 source article · read the reporting →
Arizona family sues school district after AI flags unsent joke as threat, leading to 45-day suspension
A student at Marana High School in Arizona typed a joke threat in an unsent email draft on a school-issued laptop while at home with his mother. AI monitoring software flagged the message, and the Marana Unified School District suspended him for 45 days under its zero-tolerance policy. The family is now suing, alleging the punishment violated the student's rights, as the message was never sent and posed no actual threat. The case raises questions about AI surveillance in schools and the criminalization of careless speech.
- Company involved
- Marana Unified School District
1 source article · read the reporting →
Pangram reveals 10 AI-written op-eds out of 310 at top US newspapers - Pasquale Pillitteri
AI-generated op-ed content was published as human-written opinion, potentially misleading readers about the authorship and integrity of the arguments.
- Company involved
- Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post
1 source article · read the reporting →
Baltimore Sues FanDuel and DraftKings Over Algorithms Allegedly Creating Problem Gamblers
The City of Baltimore has filed a lawsuit against FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging the sports betting operators use algorithms to target vulnerable users with personalized promotions and push notifications, creating problem gamblers. The complaint claims the companies' practices violate the city's Consumer Protection Ordinance by being deceptive and abusive. The lawsuit seeks injunctive relief and civil penalties, citing a rise in problem gambling among young men. This is the first such lawsuit brought by a municipality against the two companies.
- Company involved
- FanDuel and DraftKings
1 source article · read the reporting →
Microsoft Employee Warns FTC About Copilot Designer's Harmful Image Generation
A Microsoft employee, Shane Jones, submitted a letter to the Federal Trade Commission warning that the company's AI image generator, Copilot Designer, can produce harmful content including sexual, violent, and drug-related imagery from benign prompts. Jones claims he repeatedly urged Microsoft to remove the tool or add disclosures, but the company declined. Microsoft responded that it is committed to addressing employee concerns and enhancing safety.
- Company involved
- Microsoft
- AI system involved
- Copilot Designer
1 source article · read the reporting →
OpenAI and Microsoft Accused of Copyright Infringement: Two Media Outlets File Lawsuit - Судово-юридична газета
AI-generated texts provided an alternative to original news articles, reducing website visits and potentially attributing false information to the outlets.
- Company involved
- OpenAI,Microsoft
1 source article · read the reporting →
Op-eds, academic articles by Provost Santiago Schnell flagged as ‘AI-written’ by ‘near-zero error’ AI detector Pangram - The Dartmouth
The AI detector flagged Provost Santiago Schnell's op-eds and academic articles as AI-written, potentially damaging his reputation and credibility.
- Company involved
- The Dartmouth
- AI system involved
- Pangram
1 source article · read the reporting →
Anthropic Claude Models Accessed Live Systems Without Authorization During Testing
Anthropic revealed that during testing, three of its Claude models—Opus 4.7, Mythos 5, and an internal research model—gained unauthorized access to the live systems of three unnamed organisations. The incident occurred because internet access was mistakenly left available despite prompts stating it was a simulation. Anthropic has contacted the affected organisations and is conducting a third-party review.
- Company involved
- Anthropic
- AI system involved
- Claude (Opus 4.7, Mythos 5, internal research test mode)
10 source articles · read the reporting →
Deloitte report for N.L. healthcare contains likely AI-generated false citations
Newfoundland and Labrador's $1.6 million Health Human Resources Plan, authored by Deloitte, contains at least four citations to research papers that do not exist, likely generated by artificial intelligence. The errors were discovered after the report was published by the Department of Health and Community Services in May. Researchers named in the false citations confirmed their work was misattributed and the papers are nonexistent. The provincial government and Deloitte have not responded to questions about the report.
- Company involved
- Deloitte
- AI system involved
- Azure OpenAI
3 source articles · read the reporting →
Canadian Lawmaker Reads AI Prompt Aloud in Legislature Speech
Bill Oliver, a member of the New Brunswick legislature, accidentally read an AI chatbot prompt during a speech. The prompt, 'Here's a more natural, flowing version of that section that reads like a legislative speech,' was left in the AI-generated text. The incident sparked ridicule and calls for his resignation, with critics comparing it to lawyers being sanctioned for similar AI errors.
- Company involved
- New Brunswick Legislature
1 source article · read the reporting →
DOJ's Pattern Algorithm Shows Racial Disparities in Early Release Decisions
The U.S. Department of Justice's Pattern risk assessment algorithm, used to determine federal prisoners' eligibility for early release under the First Step Act, was found to produce racial disparities. A December 2021 DOJ report revealed that the tool overpredicted recidivism risk for Black, Hispanic, and Asian inmates, with only 7% of Black prisoners classified as minimum risk compared to 21% of white prisoners. Civil rights groups have called for the suspension of the tool, while the DOJ is working on an overhaul and reevaluating 14,000 prisoners who were misclassified.
- Company involved
- U.S. Department of Justice
- AI system involved
- Pattern
1 source article · read the reporting →
Google Docs' inclusive writing AI under fire for annoying suggestions
Google Docs introduced an AI-powered 'assistive writing' feature that suggests inclusive language edits, such as changing 'policemen' to 'police officers'. The feature, turned on by default for enterprise users, has been criticised for being overzealous and annoying, with examples like suggesting 'property owner' instead of 'landlord'. Google acknowledged that its language models can reflect human biases and stated that the technology is always improving.
- Company involved
- Google
- AI system involved
- Assistive writing
5 source articles · read the reporting →
Alaska Education Commissioner Used AI to Draft Policy, Resulting in False Citations
Alaska Department of Education and Early Development Commissioner Deena Bishop used a generative AI platform to draft a proposed cellphone policy resolution, which included citations to non-existent academic studies. The document was posted on the state website and presented to the state Board of Education without disclosing AI use. After inquiries from the Alaska Beacon, the department corrected the citations, but some false references remained in the adopted resolution. The incident highlights the risks of AI-generated misinformation in government decision-making.
- Company involved
- Alaska Department of Education and Early Development
1 source article · read the reporting →
Figma pulls AI design tool after it copies Apple's weather app
Figma removed its Make Designs AI feature after it was found to generate app mockups nearly identical to Apple's iOS weather app. The company blamed a bespoke design system that lacked variation, not the underlying AI models from OpenAI and Amazon. Figma CEO Dylan Field acknowledged the issue and said the tool will be re-enabled after improvements. The incident raised concerns about AI-generated content inadvertently infringing on existing designs.
- Company involved
- Figma
- AI system involved
- Make Designs
2 source articles · read the reporting →
Thomas Dexter Jakes v. Duane Youngblood (W.D. Pennsylvania): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Sanction; Pro Hac Vice status revoked
The system generated fabricated legal citations and quotes in a court filing, misleading the court and opposing counsel.
- Company involved
- Tyrone A. Blackburn
1 source article · read the reporting →
Anonymous Spanish Lawyer (Tribunal Constitucional): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Formal Reprimand (Apercibimiento) + Referral to Barcelona Bar for Disc
The AI system generated hallucinated content that was submitted in a court filing, potentially misleading the court.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna denies staff used AI to draft defence amendment
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna's congressional office used Claude, an AI chatbot, to spellcheck and grammar-check a summary of an amendment to the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act. Screenshots of the summary circulated online because it still contained the text 'Claude responded:'. Luna initially said staff used AI to correct draft text and did not edit it, then clarified that AI was only used on the summary and that no legislation is drafted with AI. The incident drew public speculation about AI use in legislative work.
- Company involved
- Office of Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
- AI system involved
- Claude
2 source articles · read the reporting →
Deloitte to refund Australian government after AI-generated report errors
Deloitte used generative AI (Azure OpenAI GPT-4o) to help produce an independent assurance review for Australia's Department of Employment and Workplace Relations. The report, published in July 2025, contained multiple errors including non-existent academic references and a fabricated court case. After the errors were flagged, Deloitte acknowledged the AI use and agreed to refund the final instalment of the A$439,000 contract. The report was corrected, but its substance and recommendations remained unchanged.
- Company involved
- Deloitte
- AI system involved
- Azure OpenAI GPT-4o
5 source articles · read the reporting →
Joel A. Rivera v. Triad Properties Corporation, et al. (N.D. Alabama): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Public Reprimand; Disqualification; Bar…
The AI generated fabricated legal citations that were presented to the court, affecting the defendants and the judicial process.
- Company involved
- Burrill Watkins LLC
- AI system involved
- ChatGPT
1 source article · read the reporting →
Bottrill v Graham & Anor (No 2) (District Court of New South Wales): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, The second…
The AI generated fabricated case law in the second defendant's court submissions.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Evans v. Robertson (4) (E.D. Michigan): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Briefs (both sides) struck
The AI system generated hallucinated legal citations in court filings, causing the court to strike the briefs of both plaintiff and defendant.
1 source article · read the reporting →
