Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.
Reports people file about their own experience are not shown here and never will be without their agreement. Tell us what happened to you.
44 incidents closest to “Lexis+ AI” · matched on meaning · public reporting
The attorney's use of generative AI to draft a legal brief produced incorrect case citations, subjecting the attorney to potential court sanctions and affecting the integrity of the filing.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Attorneys from Ellis George LLP and K&L Gates LLP submitted a brief to a special master in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California containing numerous hallucinated legal citations generated by AI tools including CoCounsel, Westlaw Precision, and Google Gemini. The lawyers failed to verify the citations, and even after being alerted to errors, filed a corrected brief that still contained fake authorities. Special Master Michael Wilner found the conduct tantamount to bad faith, struck the brief, denied discovery relief, and ordered the firms to jointly pay $31,100 in the defendant's legal fees.
3 source articles · read the reporting →
AI generated false legal citations that were submitted in court, affecting the plaintiff in an insurance dispute.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Generated legal filings that were submitted to a court, potentially affecting the client's case and the court's proceedings.
1 source article · read the reporting →
In-house counsel group accuses rival of training AI on its materials Reuters
1 source article · read the reporting →
A federal judge's temporary restraining order blocked parts of Mississippi House Bill 1193, affecting state officials, educators, parents, and students, while also citing nonexistent people and misstating law.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The New York Times filed a lawsuit against AI startup Perplexity, alleging the company illegally scraped and distributed its copyrighted content to generate search responses. Perplexity's spokesperson dismissed the suit, comparing it to past unsuccessful legal actions against new technologies. The case is pending in the Southern District of New York.
4 source articles · read the reporting →
A judge issued a court order reprimanding an attorney, based on AI-generated false case citations.
1 source article · read the reporting →
A junior advocate in South Africa used the AI tool Legal Genius to draft court submissions for an urgent licensing dispute. The written arguments contained multiple non-existent case citations, which the presiding judge discovered. The junior counsel admitted to using the AI tool, apologised, and was referred to the Legal Practice Council for investigation, while the senior counsel also apologised for conducting only a 'sense-check'.
4 source articles · read the reporting →
Microsoft dan xAI Digugat Warga atas Kebisingan Data Center - Telset.id
Microsoft and xAI are facing lawsuits from residents over noise from data centers in Wisconsin and Mississippi. At least six similar cases have been filed in 2026, alleging nuisance and negligence. The lawsuits highlight issues with low-frequency noise measurement and pollution from gas turbines.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The NAACP, represented by the Southern Environmental Law Center and Earthjustice, sued xAI and its subsidiary MZX Tech, alleging it ran dozens of methane gas turbines in Southaven, Mississippi, without a Clean Air Act permit to power its Colossus 2 AI data centre. The groups say the plant may be the largest industrial source of smog-forming nitrogen oxides in the Memphis area and that nearby, largely Black neighbourhoods bear the pollution. The US Justice Department later moved to have the case dismissed, citing national security.
1 source article · read the reporting →
A Melbourne lawyer used AI software Leap to generate a list of case citations for a family court hearing. The citations were fake, causing the hearing to be adjourned. The lawyer apologized and paid costs, but was referred to the Victorian Legal Services Board and Commissioner for investigation. The software vendor Leap stated that a verification process was available but not used by the lawyer.
4 source articles · read the reporting →
The AI-generated performance evaluation contributed to the teacher's termination.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Ranked job applicants' likelihood of success, affecting their hiring prospects.
1 source article · read the reporting →
訴状もプレスリリースも「AIだのみ」 弁護士つけずに〝本人訴訟〟 驚いて取材すると… - ｄメニューニュース
A man relied entirely on AI to draft a lawsuit and a press release, then filed a pro se complaint against a yakiniku restaurant. He alleged the restaurant served him cold noodles that had fallen into a drain and sought 30,000 yen in damages. Even the decision to contact reporters was made with AI guidance.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Seattle Times và Newsday kiện OpenAI và Microsoft vì nội dung tin tức - Unite.AI
On September 4, 2026, The Seattle Times and Newsday filed a federal lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them of using the newspapers' copyrighted content to train AI models without permission or payment. The publishers also allege that OpenAI diluted their trademarks by generating fabricated content falsely attributed to them. The lawsuit seeks damages and the destruction of AI training datasets containing their work.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The Federal Court denied leave to file an AI-generated pleading, delaying the applicant's case.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Luật sư bị phạt vì dùng AI 'bịa' lời khai nhân chứng - Báo Thanh Niên
The New Mexico Supreme Court fined defense attorney Stephen Aarons $5,000 for filing legal documents with false witness statements created by ChatGPT. Aarons had input case materials into the AI, hoping for a perfect summary, but it generated fabricated details. The court found he failed to verify the documents and referred his case to a disciplinary board.
1 source article · read the reporting →
"아동 성착취물로 AI 훈련?"...머스크 xAI, 집단 소송 휘말려 - YTN
A lawsuit claims xAI used images of a plaintiff's childhood sexual abuse to train its Grok AI model without consent. The victim says AI-generated child sexual abuse material depicting them was created and spread through Grok. The suit seeks damages per violation and demands xAI block tools that generate sexual images.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Attorney Howe used Westlaw's CoCounsel AI to draft appellate briefs for a criminal defendant. The briefs contained fabricated quotations and misrepresented case holdings. The Sixth Circuit discovered the AI use from the file name and, upon investigation, found the citations false. Howe admitted he failed to adequately review the AI-generated content. The court denied compensation, appointed new counsel, and referred Howe for disciplinary proceedings.
1 source article · read the reporting →
In a defamation case in Johannesburg, lawyers for plaintiff Michelle Parker used ChatGPT to find supporting judgments, but the cases turned out to be entirely fictitious, generated by the AI's hallucination. The opposing counsel and law librarians could not locate the cited judgments, leading to the discovery that they were fabricated. The magistrate found no intent to mislead but ordered Parker to pay punitive costs, warning against relying on AI without verification.
4 source articles · read the reporting →
The High Court of Justice of the Canary Islands fined a lawyer €420 for including 48 false case citations generated by a general-purpose AI tool in an appeal brief. The court found the lawyer failed to verify the citations against official databases, breaching the duty of veracity and good faith. The lawyer admitted the facts and expressed remorse, leading to a reduced fine. The court also referred the matter to the local bar association for possible disciplinary action.
4 source articles · read the reporting →
Chicago Tribune Company, LLC filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI, Inc. in the Southern District of New York on December 4, 2025. The complaint alleges copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 501. The case is assigned to Judge Loretta A. Preska.
5 source articles · read the reporting →
The AI tool generated fictitious case law citations that were included in a court filing, affecting the plaintiff and the court.
1 source article · read the reporting →
