Korean universities introduce anti-cheating measures after AI misconduct
Students at Korea University, Yonsei University, and Seoul National University allegedly used generative AI tools like ChatGPT to cheat on online exams and quizzes. Korea University voided a midterm exam and plans to implement randomized questions and monitoring software for the affected course. Yonsei University has AI use guidelines but acknowledges they are not enforceable, while Seoul National University held a retest for one class. Investigations are ongoing, and it remains unclear whether students will face disciplinary action.
- Company involved
- Korea University, Yonsei University, Seoul National University
- AI system involved
- ChatGPT
3 source articles · read the reporting →
AI detector scores banned as evidence at Yale and Johns Hopkins, vendor conflict exposed - Pasquale Pillitteri
The system flagged student assignments as AI-generated, potentially leading to academic misconduct accusations.
- Company involved
- Yale University and Johns Hopkins University
- AI system involved
- Turnitin AI detector
1 source article · read the reporting →
Furman University student caught using ChatGPT to write essay
A student at Furman University allegedly used OpenAI's ChatGPT to generate an essay for an upper-level philosophy class. Professor Darren Hick detected the AI-generated text using the GPTZero detection tool. The incident highlights growing concerns about AI-assisted cheating in schools, with some districts like Los Angeles Unified blocking the chatbot.
- Company involved
- Furman University
- AI system involved
- ChatGPT
10 source articles · read the reporting →
Student Overturns AI Cheating Accusation in Court, Three Others Lose
一名学生在法庭上推翻 AI 作弊指控，另外三人败诉 - Pasquale Pillitteri
New York's Nassau County Supreme Court vacated Adelphi University's disciplinary action against student Orion Newby, who had been accused of using AI, finding the university's conclusion lacked a reasonable basis and that it had ignored exculpatory evidence and his disability status. In three other recent cases, courts upheld decisions by schools or universities.
- Company involved
- Adelphi University
- AI system involved
- Turnitin
1 source article · read the reporting →
15-Year-Old Test Exposes Flaw: ChatGPT for Teens Fails to Block Homework Cheating, Repeated Requests Bypass Restrictions
15歲使用者實測揭漏洞：青少年版ChatGPT難擋宿題代寫，反覆要求即破解 - BigGo 財經
A 15-year-old tester found that OpenAI's ChatGPT for Teens, launched in August, initially refused to write essays but generated full examples after repeated requests. It also immediately solved SAT-level math problems. Parental controls require account linking and are off by default, while experts warn the memory feature could lead to emotional attachment.
- Company involved
- OpenAI
- AI system involved
- ChatGPT for Teens
1 source article · read the reporting →
Op-eds, academic articles by Provost Santiago Schnell flagged as ‘AI-written’ by ‘near-zero error’ AI detector Pangram - The Dartmouth
The AI detector flagged Provost Santiago Schnell's op-eds and academic articles as AI-written, potentially damaging his reputation and credibility.
- Company involved
- The Dartmouth
- AI system involved
- Pangram
1 source article · read the reporting →
Sydney students resit NAPLAN after predictive text glitch
Year 5 students at Waverley College and Kambala in Sydney were required to resit their NAPLAN writing exams after a technical glitch enabled Apple's predictive text and spellcheck features during the test. The issue was discovered by a teacher and students, and the schools reported it to NESA and ACARA. The students were given a new prompt and completed the test the following Monday. An ACARA spokesman stated the problem was not widespread, with over 880,000 tests submitted successfully.
- Company involved
- ACARA
- AI system involved
- NAPLAN
2 source articles · read the reporting →
Deloitte report for N.L. healthcare contains likely AI-generated false citations
Newfoundland and Labrador's $1.6 million Health Human Resources Plan, authored by Deloitte, contains at least four citations to research papers that do not exist, likely generated by artificial intelligence. The errors were discovered after the report was published by the Department of Health and Community Services in May. Researchers named in the false citations confirmed their work was misattributed and the papers are nonexistent. The provincial government and Deloitte have not responded to questions about the report.
- Company involved
- Deloitte
- AI system involved
- Azure OpenAI
3 source articles · read the reporting →
Google Books Indexing AI-Written Works Raises Concerns for Ngram Tool
Google Books has reportedly begun indexing low-quality books that appear to have been written by artificial intelligence. A search for the phrase 'as of my last knowledge update' returned numerous books that seemed to be AI-generated, including some that did not discuss AI. Google stated that recent works are not yet included in its Ngram viewer, but they could be in future updates, potentially corrupting the language research tool used by academics.
- Company involved
- Google
- AI system involved
- Google Books
1 source article · read the reporting →
Western Sydney University academic used AI to write opinion piece
Professor Cath Ellis, a pro vice chancellor at Western Sydney University, used Microsoft Copilot to write an opinion piece defending universities against claims of devalued qualifications. The piece was published by The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, but academics noticed AI-generated language patterns. The newspapers removed the article after learning AI was used without disclosure, and the university defended the use as appropriate.
- Company involved
- Western Sydney University
- AI system involved
- Copilot
1 source article · read the reporting →
University of Toronto exam monitoring software disadvantages BIPOC students
The University of Toronto continued using ProctorU and Examity exam monitoring software despite reports that the facial recognition technology fails to identify BIPOC students, causing stress and delays. Students like Maame Adjoa experienced the AI system being unable to verify their identity, requiring manual intervention. The university acknowledged the equity concerns but has not banned the software, while ProctorU stated that human proctors make final decisions. The issue has drawn criticism from US senators and researchers who highlight built-in bias in AI facial recognition.
- Company involved
- University of Toronto
- AI system involved
- ProctorU, Examity
1 source article · read the reporting →
University of Texas at Austin Stops Using Biased Ph.D. Admissions Algorithm
The University of Texas at Austin's computer science department used a machine-learning system called GRADE from 2013 to 2020 to score Ph.D. applicants. Critics argued the system perpetuated bias by training on past admissions decisions and using features like institution prestige and biased language in recommendation letters. The department discontinued the system in 2020, citing maintenance difficulties, but the controversy highlighted concerns about algorithmic fairness in admissions. The system was never disclosed to applicants, and its impact on underrepresented groups remains unknown.
- Company involved
- University of Texas at Austin
- AI system involved
- GRADE
2 source articles · read the reporting →
Grammarly pulls AI tool that impersonated writers without consent
Grammarly, operated by Superhuman, disabled its Expert Review AI feature that offered writing suggestions in the style of famous authors like Stephen King and Julia Angwin. The tool used writers' names and personas without consent, leading to a class-action lawsuit filed in New York alleging misappropriation of identities for commercial gain. Investigative journalist Julia Angwin described the imitation as a 'slopperganger' that gave poor advice. Superhuman's CEO apologised, acknowledging the tool had 'misrepresented' the voices of experts, and the company removed it for redesign.
- Company involved
- Superhuman
- AI system involved
- Grammarly Expert Review
5 source articles · read the reporting →
Elsevier Scopus ranking gamed by fake journals with cross-citations
Three journals from Addleton Academic Publishers appeared in the top 10 of Elsevier's Scopus CiteScore philosophy ranking due to extensive cross-citation and automatically generated papers with fake authors and affiliations. The ranking is used by Jagiellonian University and other institutions for hiring, awards and promotions, meaning three legitimate journals were pushed into a lower tier. The publisher later moved the journals to an Indian entity and Scopus removed four Addleton titles for 'Publication Concerns'.
- Company involved
- Jagiellonian University
- AI system involved
- Scopus CiteScore
1 source article · read the reporting →
AI detector falsely accuses student of cheating at Central Methodist University
Moira Olmsted, a student at Central Methodist University, submitted a written assignment and received a zero grade after her professor said an AI detection tool flagged her work as AI-generated. Olmsted alleges the accusation was false and that her writing had been flagged at least once before. The incident highlights the risk of AI detectors falsely accusing students of cheating.
- Company involved
- Central Methodist University
1 source article · read the reporting →
Universities' use of race in student risk algorithms harms Black and Latinx students
The Markup found that several universities, including UMass Amherst, UW–Milwaukee, and Texas A&M, use EAB's Navigate software which incorporates race as a predictor of student dropout risk. The algorithms label Black and Latinx students as high risk at disproportionately high rates compared to White students. Students, professors, and experts worry this is pushing minority students out of math and science majors through biased advising.
- Company involved
- University of Massachusetts Amherst,University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee,Texas A&M University,Texas Tech University,South Dakota State University
- AI system involved
- Navigate
1 source article · read the reporting →
Turnitin's AI Detector Falsely Flags Student's Essay as AI-Generated
A Washington Post test of Turnitin's new AI writing detector found it erroneously flagged 8% of a high school student's original essay as likely generated by ChatGPT. The student, Lucy Goetz, had not used AI, raising concerns about false accusations of cheating. Turnitin acknowledged the issue and added a caution flag, but educators worry about the potential for baseless academic-integrity investigations. The incident highlights the challenges of detecting AI-generated text and the need for careful human review.
- Company involved
- Turnitin
- AI system involved
- Turnitin AI writing detector
1 source article · read the reporting →
Hanoi students caught using AI to cheat in graduation exam
Two students in Hanoi used mobile phones to photograph questions from the national high school graduation exam and submitted them to AI apps like StudyX, Gemini, and ChatGPT for answers. Proctors detected the cheating, and the students were suspended. Hanoi police are investigating the incident, which has raised concerns about exam security and integrity. The students face disqualification and possible administrative or criminal penalties.
- AI system involved
- StudyX, Gemini, ChatGPT
2 source articles · read the reporting →
Texas A&M Professor Uses ChatGPT to Falsely Accuse Students of Cheating
Jared Mumm, an instructor at Texas A&M University–Commerce, used ChatGPT to check if students' writing was AI-generated, leading him to accuse them of using the chatbot. He informed students they would receive an incomplete grade and those deemed guilty would get a zero, causing distress and temporarily withholding one student's diploma. The university investigated and stated that no students failed or were barred from graduating, and the professor is working individually with students to resolve the issue.
- Company involved
- Texas A&M University–Commerce
- AI system involved
- ChatGPT
5 source articles · read the reporting →
Researchers hide prompts to manipulate AI peer review
Nikkei found hidden prompts in 17 preprints on arXiv that instructed AI tools to give the papers positive reviews and ignore negatives. The manuscripts were linked to 14 academic institutions, including Waseda University, KAIST, Peking University, the National University of Singapore, the University of Washington and Columbia University. At least one paper was set to be withdrawn, while some researchers defended the prompts as a check on reviewers who improperly use AI.
- Company involved
- Multiple academic institutions
- AI system involved
- arXiv
1 source article · read the reporting →
RFK Jr.'s MAHA Report Riddled with AI-Generated Fake Citations
An investigation found dozens of errors in the White House's 'Make America Healthy Again' commission report, including broken links, wrong authors, and entirely fictitious sources. The presence of 'oaicite' markers in URLs strongly suggests that ChatGPT was used to generate citations, leading to AI hallucinations. The White House described the errors as a 'formatting issue' and updated the report to correct some of them, while defending the report's substance.
- Company involved
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- AI system involved
- ChatGPT
3 source articles · read the reporting →
Educational Testing Service's E-rater algorithm biases essay scores against minority students
The Educational Testing Service's E-rater algorithm, used to grade essays on the GRE and other standardized tests, has been found to systematically give higher scores to students from mainland China and lower scores to African American students compared to human graders. The bias stems from the algorithm's reliance on surface-level metrics like vocabulary and sentence length, which disadvantage certain groups. Despite studies dating back to 1999, the bias persists, and in many states, only a small percentage of essays are reviewed by humans.
- Company involved
- Educational Testing Service
- AI system involved
- E-rater
10 source articles · read the reporting →
NSW Education Standards Authority used AI-generated image in HSC English exam without disclosure
The NSW Education Standards Authority (NESA) used an AI-generated image as a stimulus in the 2024 HSC English exam without disclosing its origin. The image, created by Florian Schroeder using OpenAI's ChatGPT and Dall-E 2, was published on Medium in July 2023. Students suspected AI use due to irregularities in the image, and NESA initially declined to confirm. After the Sydney Morning Herald confirmed the image was AI-generated, NESA stated that students would be marked on their response to the question, not the image's origin.
- Company involved
- NSW Education Standards Authority
- AI system involved
- ChatGPT and Dall-E 2
6 source articles · read the reporting →
Middle schooler beats Edgenuity grading algorithm to get perfect score
A seventh-grade student in the Los Angeles Unified School District received a failing grade on a history assignment graded by Edgenuity's automated scoring algorithm. With help from his mother, a history professor, he reverse-engineered the algorithm by writing a paragraph with relevant keywords and a jumble of words, earning a perfect score. The incident highlights concerns about the accuracy and fairness of automated grading systems in education.
- Company involved
- Los Angeles Unified School District
- AI system involved
- Edgenuity
10 source articles · read the reporting →
