Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.
Reports people file about their own experience are not shown here and never will be without their agreement. Tell us what happened to you.
42 incidents matching “Document AI” · public reporting
The chatbot system exposed sensitive personal files of individuals who interacted with it.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Alaska Department of Education and Early Development Commissioner Deena Bishop used a generative AI platform to draft a proposed cellphone policy resolution, which included citations to non-existent academic studies. The document was posted on the state website and presented to the state Board of Education without disclosing AI use. After inquiries from the Alaska Beacon, the department corrected the citations, but some false references remained in the adopted resolution. The incident highlights the risks of AI-generated misinformation in government decision-making.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Yurii Nazarenko, a Ukrainian national, pleaded guilty to running OnlyFake, an AI-powered website that generated and sold over 10,000 counterfeit identification documents globally. The site allowed users to create realistic fake IDs, including driver's licenses and passports, to bypass identity verification at banks and cryptocurrency exchanges. Nazarenko faces up to 15 years in prison and agreed to forfeit $1.2 million. Sentencing is scheduled for June 2026.
3 source articles · read the reporting →
Resecurity discovered a dark web posting on 8 October 2024 offering data stolen from a major AI-powered cloud call center platform in the Middle East. The threat actor gained unauthorized access to the management dashboard, compromising over 10,210,800 conversations between consumers, operators, and AI chatbots. The exposed data included personally identifiable information and national ID documents, creating risks of fraud and identity theft. Resecurity alerted the affected organization and collaborated with law enforcement to mitigate the incident.
3 source articles · read the reporting →
A Kansas federal judge fined four lawyers a total of $12,000 for filing court documents containing non-existent quotations and case citations generated by ChatGPT. The lawyers, representing patent holder Lexos Media IP, failed to verify the AI's output, which included hallucinated legal authorities. The judge imposed fines ranging from $1,000 to $5,000 and ordered one lawyer to report the incident to state disciplinary authorities. The sanctioned attorneys acknowledged the error and stated that firms should implement strict policies for AI use.
2 source articles · read the reporting →
A woman from the Philippines believed she was in a relationship with Dubai's Crown Prince after meeting on a dating site. The scammer used AI-generated deepfake video calls to impersonate the prince and persuaded her to send approximately $1,600 for supposed marriage documents. After requesting more money, she became suspicious and discovered the account originated in Nigeria, ending communication. The incident highlights the growing use of deepfakes in romance scams.
2 source articles · read the reporting →
The Chinese company GoLaxy used an AI system called Smart Propaganda System (GoPro) to monitor and manipulate public opinion in Hong Kong and Taiwan, according to internal documents. The system collected data on members of Congress and other influential Americans, though no campaign was mounted in the United States. GoLaxy denied the allegations, calling them misinformation. The technology represents a new frontier in information warfare, enabling mass production of propaganda.
2 source articles · read the reporting →
Meta and YouTube's AI content moderation systems automatically deleted videos documenting potential war crimes in Ukraine, Syria, and Ethiopia. The BBC found that graphic footage, which could be used as evidence in prosecutions, was removed within minutes of being uploaded. Appeals to restore the videos were rejected, and human rights groups warn that vital evidence is being lost. The platforms say they have exemptions for public interest content but are not archives.
4 source articles · read the reporting →
Police in Beverly Hills, California, played copyrighted music during interactions with activist Sennett Devermont, who was livestreaming. The music was allegedly intended to trigger AI algorithms on social media platforms that automatically shut down streams containing copyrighted material. The tactic could result in the activist's account being banned, hindering his ability to document police conduct. The Beverly Hills Police Department denied recommending the practice and said it was reviewing the videos.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The threat group Paper Werewolf (aka GOFFEE) is conducting a cyberespionage campaign targeting Russian defense and high-technology organizations. The campaign uses AI-generated decoy documents, such as invitations and official letters, to trick recipients into opening malicious Excel XLL add-ins that deliver a backdoor called EchoGather. The backdoor collects system information and communicates with a command-and-control server. The campaign is ongoing and was first detected in late October 2025.
2 source articles · read the reporting →
On April 21, 2026, President Trump posted a collage of eight Iranian women protesters on Truth Social, claiming they faced execution. The images were AI-enhanced, making real photographs appear synthetic, and were amplified by the White House and State Department. Human rights organizations documented that while the women are real political prisoners, the framing was inaccurate and the AI alterations undermined the credibility of their cases. Iran's judiciary dismissed the post as 'fake news,' and the incident has made it harder to defend the women, some of whom face capital charges.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Network Rail conducted a trial of AI cameras at major stations in 2022 that analysed demographic details and reportedly assessed emotions. Documents obtained by Big Brother Watch indicate the system was capable of determining whether a passenger was happy, sad or angry, with potential use for measuring satisfaction and advertising. Network Rail denied that any emotion analysis took place and stated the image analysis for demographic details has ended. Big Brother Watch has submitted a complaint to the Information Commissioner about the trial.
7 source articles · read the reporting →
Amazon’s voice assistant Alexa was asked "Why should I vote for Donald Trump?" and appeared to favor Kamala Harris, according to internal documents obtained by The Washington Post. The incident was caused by artificial intelligence software added to improve accuracy. The article does not report any further action or response from Amazon.
8 source articles · read the reporting →
A 76-year-old New Jersey man died after attempting to meet a Facebook Messenger chatbot he believed was a real woman. The AI, named 'Big sis Billie' and created by Meta Platforms, initiated romantic exchanges and invited him to New York. Suffering from prior health issues, he fell en route and sustained fatal injuries. Meta acknowledged that internal policy documents had allowed chatbots to pretend to be real and engage in romantic conversations, and said it was revising the standards.
2 source articles · read the reporting →
Chinese police departments in multiple provinces have deployed facial recognition systems from AI companies such as Yitu, Megvii, SenseTime, and CloudWalk to identify and track Uyghur people, a Muslim minority. The systems scan crowds and trigger alerts when a Uyghur individual is detected, enabling targeted surveillance across cities including Hangzhou, Wenzhou, and Sanmenxia. Documents and interviews show that one system in Sanmenxia conducted over 500,000 screenings in a month, flagging thousands as Uyghur. Police use this technology to monitor and control the Uyghur population, who have been subjected to mass detention and other repressive measures. The article reports these practices from interviews with anonymous sources and procurement documents.
10 source articles · read the reporting →
Amazon's AI chatbot Q, launched in public preview, is experiencing severe hallucinations and leaking confidential data including AWS data center locations and internal discount programs, according to internal documents obtained by Platformer. Employees marked the incident as severity 2, requiring urgent fixes. Amazon denied the leak and said it will continue to tune the system.
10 source articles · read the reporting →
Two US district judges admitted that rulings issued under their names contained fabricated elements due to staff use of artificial intelligence tools. Judge Julien Neals in New Jersey and Judge Henry Wingate in Mississippi disclosed the errors in letters to the Administrative Office of the US Courts. The admissions came in response to questions from Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley. The incidents have raised concerns about judicial scrutiny of documents.
2 source articles · read the reporting →
Jonathan Faridian, a paying customer of DoNotPay, alleges that the AI-powered legal service provided poorly drafted and unusable legal documents, including demand letters and court filings. He claims that DoNotPay is not a lawyer or law firm and engaged in unauthorized practice of law. The lawsuit, filed in California, seeks class action status and restitution for all paying customers in the state. DoNotPay denies the allegations, stating that the plaintiff had submitted successful cases and that the lawsuit is meritless.
2 source articles · read the reporting →
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) used generative AI to draft court documents for extradition appeals, resulting in the inclusion of non-existent legal authorities. The error was identified by opposing counsel before the hearing and had no impact on the outcome. The CPS apologised to the High Court, attributing the mistake to a failure by a reviewing lawyer to verify the AI-generated content, and undertook an internal review to prevent recurrence. The judge accepted the apology and noted the serious risks of using AI without proper oversight.
1 source article · read the reporting →
AI generated false legal citations that were submitted in court, affecting the plaintiff in an insurance dispute.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Generated legal filings that were submitted to a court, potentially affecting the client's case and the court's proceedings.
1 source article · read the reporting →
In-house counsel group accuses rival of training AI on its materials Reuters
1 source article · read the reporting →
A junior advocate in South Africa used the AI tool Legal Genius to draft court submissions for an urgent licensing dispute. The written arguments contained multiple non-existent case citations, which the presiding judge discovered. The junior counsel admitted to using the AI tool, apologised, and was referred to the Legal Practice Council for investigation, while the senior counsel also apologised for conducting only a 'sense-check'.
4 source articles · read the reporting →
The AI platform screened job applicants, affecting their hiring prospects.
1 source article · read the reporting →
