Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.
Reports people file about their own experience are not shown here and never will be without their agreement. Tell us what happened to you.
44 incidents closest to “Accenture Human Services Suite” · matched on meaning · public reporting
Job applicants were automatically screened out by AI, allegedly discriminating against older, minority, and disabled applicants.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The system screened out job applicants based on personality tests, video interviews, and cognitive assessments, affecting autistic, neurodivergent, and people of color.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The ACLU filed complaints with state and federal agencies on behalf of a deaf, Indigenous employee of Intuit who was denied a promotion after an automated HireVue video interview. The tool did not caption all audible questions and could not accurately transcribe her speech, which the complaint says disadvantaged her because of her disability and race.
1 source article · read the reporting →
AI screening system determined which job applicants to advance to the next stage of recruitment.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The system screened and ranked job applicants, leading to rejections for individuals over 40.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Linda, 37, profilerad av Arbetsförmedlingens AI: ”Nedvärderande” - Aftonbladet
Linda Hellman, 37, was profiled by the Swedish Public Employment Service’s AI tool without her knowledge. She felt the experience was degrading and criticized the tool as misleading and unreliable. She has been unemployed for nearly a year and is part of the ‘Rusta och matcha’ program, but has not found a job despite applying for an average of 28 jobs per month.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Daniel Swanson, a 24-year IBM manager in Austin, sued IBM in federal court, saying he was fired at 48 and then rejected for other roles because IBM's AI-driven HR screening software was programmed to favour younger workers. IBM denies the claims.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Верховный апелляционный суд ЮАР рассмотрел дело об алгоритмах Sassa - UA.NEWS
The Supreme Court of Appeal heard an appeal on 25 August about Sassa's digital application system for the SRD grant. The system only accepts online applications and uses automated bank account checks that may deny grants to people whose accounts receive deposits that are not regular income. The Global Center on AI Governance submitted that automated decisions must uphold constitutional rights and be fair, non-discriminatory, and suited to South Africa's informal economy.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Newfoundland and Labrador's $1.6 million Health Human Resources Plan, authored by Deloitte, contains at least four citations to research papers that do not exist, likely generated by artificial intelligence. The errors were discovered after the report was published by the Department of Health and Community Services in May. Researchers named in the false citations confirmed their work was misattributed and the papers are nonexistent. The provincial government and Deloitte have not responded to questions about the report.
3 source articles · read the reporting →
A trial of AI-powered CCTV in two South Australian aged care facilities produced over 12,000 false alerts in a year, causing staff alert fatigue. The system, intended to detect falls and abuse, was overly sensitive and misidentified normal movements as incidents. At least one genuine resident fall went unresponded to because staff were overwhelmed. South Australia's health minister described the rollout as 'botched'.
5 source articles · read the reporting →
The city of Rotterdam deployed a machine learning algorithm built by Accenture to flag welfare recipients for fraud investigation. The system used personal data including gender, language, and subjective caseworker notes to generate risk scores, leading to investigations that disproportionately targeted women and migrants. An external review found the algorithm discriminatory and inaccurate, prompting the city to suspend its use in 2021. The system's opacity made it nearly impossible for those flagged to challenge the decisions.
6 source articles · read the reporting →
A Guardian Australia investigation found that the voiceprint system used by Services Australia's Centrelink and the Australian Taxation Office can be bypassed using an AI-generated voice clone. A journalist created a clone of their own voice from four minutes of audio and used it with a customer reference number to access their Centrelink self-service account. The system is used by millions of Australians for identity verification over the phone. Services Australia stated that it continually assesses risks and applies additional tests if unusual circumstances are detected, but did not commit to changing the technology.
1 source article · read the reporting →
More than 270,000 fake emails impersonating Services Australia and Centrelink were detected over four months in a broad phishing campaign. Cybersecurity firm Mimecast reports that cybercriminals are using artificial intelligence to create highly convincing clones of legitimate government communications about benefits. The attack targets vulnerable people and can lead to identity theft, data theft, malware, or ransomware.
4 source articles · read the reporting →
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) clarified that health insurers cannot use algorithms or AI to deny care to Medicare Advantage members. This follows lawsuits alleging UnitedHealth and Humana used an AI tool, nH Predict, to wrongfully deny post-acute care to elderly patients. The tool reportedly produced rigid estimates ignoring individual patient needs, leading to premature denials. CMS warned that non-compliance could result in penalties and increased audits.
10 source articles · read the reporting →
Los Angeles Unified School District turned off its 'Ed' AI chatbot on June 14, 2024, after the vendor AllHere furloughed most staff due to financial collapse. The chatbot, which cost $3 million, was designed to provide students and parents with academic guidance and school information. A former AllHere employee alleged that student data was improperly shared with third parties and processed overseas, raising privacy concerns. The district stated it will ensure privacy protections and plans to eventually restore the chatbot.
5 source articles · read the reporting →
In 2018, the Governor of Salta, Argentina, announced a pilot program using artificial intelligence to predict which adolescent girls would become pregnant, claiming 86% accuracy. Researchers at the Laboratorio de Inteligencia Artificial Aplicada found serious methodological errors, including data leakage that inflated accuracy and the use of inadequate survey data. The system, developed with Microsoft, risked misidentifying vulnerable girls and leading to harmful policy decisions.
4 source articles · read the reporting →
The Department of Government Efficiency developed an AI tool to identify unnecessary VA contracts, but it used outdated models and lacked context, leading to misclassification. At least 24 contracts were canceled, affecting cancer research and nurse care tools. The VA acknowledged the tool's role but stated all contracts undergo human review. Experts criticized the use of AI for such complex decisions.
2 source articles · read the reporting →
The Council of Europe Human Rights Commissioner reported that Estonia's social security system used AI to establish incapacity levels and remove benefits from elderly people without human involvement. The system allegedly made decisions automatically, leading to complaints from NGOs.
8 source articles · read the reporting →
Durham Constabulary developed the Harm Assessment Risk Tool (HART), a machine learning algorithm that assesses the recidivism risk of offenders. The tool uses 34 data categories including criminal history, age, gender and two types of postcode, one sourced from Experian's Mosaic marketing segmentation system. Big Brother Watch alleges that using such commercial consumer behaviour data to inform custody decisions risks prejudice and disproportionate targeting of deprived neighbourhoods. The force has stated it is refreshing the model with an aim to remove one of the postcode predictors.
9 source articles · read the reporting →
The UK government is reportedly using artificial intelligence to make decisions on welfare benefits and immigration applications. The system automates decisions previously made by human caseworkers. Concerns have been raised about the fairness and transparency of such automated decisions.
10 source articles · read the reporting →
A rural worker in Brazil, Josélia de Brito, had her pension application through the Meu INSS app automatically denied after the AI system misidentified her as a man. The INSS deployed the system to speed up benefit decisions, but experts say it struggles with complex rural cases. The case is cited as evidence that automation may exclude vulnerable people with limited digital access.
4 source articles · read the reporting →
Deloitte used generative AI (Azure OpenAI GPT-4o) to help produce an independent assurance review for Australia's Department of Employment and Workplace Relations. The report, published in July 2025, contained multiple errors including non-existent academic references and a fabricated court case. After the errors were flagged, Deloitte acknowledged the AI use and agreed to refund the final instalment of the A$439,000 contract. The report was corrected, but its substance and recommendations remained unchanged.
5 source articles · read the reporting →
The Austrian Public Employment Service (AMS) uses an algorithm to classify job seekers into categories A, B, and C, determining their access to benefits and training. Scientists from TU Wien, WU Wien, and University of Vienna have criticised the algorithm for lacking transparency, as only two of 96 model variants have been published. They allege that the system may discriminate against women and people with migration background, and that job seekers are not informed about how the algorithm works or given a chance to appeal.
10 source articles · read the reporting →
The Austrian Federal Administrative Court overturned a ban by the Data Protection Authority on the AMS algorithm, which predicts job chances of unemployed people. The system, trained on historical data including age, gender, and nationality, categorises individuals as high, medium or low chance of re-employment. Critics argue it discriminates against women and mothers, and that the data is now outdated due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The court ruled that the algorithm is lawful as long as a human advisor makes the final decision on training support.
5 source articles · read the reporting →
