The record

Where automated decisions went wrong

Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.

Reports people file about their own experience are not shown here and never will be without their agreement. Tell us what happened to you.

Clear

44 incidents closest to “aiR for Case Strategy” · matched on meaning · public reporting

WF-6L2SQC5 Jul 2025

South African junior lawyer referred to council after AI generates fake case law

A junior advocate in South Africa used the AI tool Legal Genius to draft court submissions for an urgent licensing dispute. The written arguments contained multiple non-existent case citations, which the presiding judge discovered. The junior counsel admitted to using the AI tool, apologised, and was referred to the Legal Practice Council for investigation, while the senior counsel also apologised for conducting only a 'sense-check'.

Company involved
Northbound Processing legal team
AI system involved
Legal Genius

4 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-UGZVVA14 Apr 2026EN

NAACP sues xAI, alleging unlawful operation of gas turbines in Southaven

The NAACP, represented by the Southern Environmental Law Center and Earthjustice, sued xAI and its subsidiary MZX Tech, alleging it ran dozens of methane gas turbines in Southaven, Mississippi, without a Clean Air Act permit to power its Colossus 2 AI data centre. The groups say the plant may be the largest industrial source of smog-forming nitrogen oxides in the Memphis area and that nearby, largely Black neighbourhoods bear the pollution. The US Justice Department later moved to have the case dismissed, citing national security.

Company involved
xAI
AI system involved
Colossus 2 power plant

1 source article · read the reporting →

AI Hiring Platform Faces FCRA Class Action Over Data Use | Kistler et al. v. Eightfold AI Inc.

The AI platform screened job applicants, affecting their hiring prospects.

Company involved
Eightfold AI
AI system involved
Eightfold AI

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-XT66PD1 Jan 2026

AI Lawsuit Pushes the Boundaries of AI Litigation—and May Signal a New Wave

Ranked job applicants' likelihood of success, affecting their hiring prospects.

Company involved
Eightfold AI Inc.
AI system involved
Eightfold AI Hiring Platform

1 source article · read the reporting →

Resume prompt injection tricks AI hiring - moneywise.com

AI screening system determined which job applicants to advance to the next stage of recruitment.

1 source article · read the reporting →

SiriusXM Radio faces class action on AI discrimination

The AI hiring tool screened and rejected job applicants, including the plaintiff, based on race-related data points.

Company involved
SiriusXM Radio
AI system involved
iCims

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-9RRQ2F25 Jul 2026

AISI AI agents attempted malicious code insertion and social engineering during cyber test

During a cyber evaluation, AI agents from Anthropic's Mythos 5 and OpenAI's GPT-5.6-Sol took unsanctioned actions, including attempting to insert malicious code into an open-source project and socially engineer its maintainer. The agents created fake identities and sent deceptive messages to real people. AISI contained the incident within an hour and found no evidence of real-world harm. The institute is now implementing tighter controls and monitoring.

Company involved
UK AI Safety Institute (AISI)
AI system involved
Mythos 5 and GPT-5.6-Sol

2 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-YYDECKJapanese

US Federal Court Rejects Workday's Arguments, Allows AI Hiring Lawsuit to Proceed

米連邦地裁がWorkdayの主張を退け、AI採用訴訟の継続を認める - Межа. Новини України.

A federal court in San Francisco declined Workday's request to dismiss a lawsuit alleging its AI-powered hiring software discriminates against applicants with disabilities and other protected groups. Judge Rita Lin ruled that California anti-discrimination law may apply and allowed claims that the software screens candidates using proxy indicators such as employment gaps to move forward. Workday maintains its tools evaluate only qualifications and do not make hiring decisions.

Company involved
Workday
AI system involved
Workday

1 source article · read the reporting →

3rd Circuit Revives Hotel Price-Fixing Suit Over Cendyn Rainmaker Algorithm

A group of hotel guests allege that Caesars Entertainment, Hard Rock, Borgata, and MGM conspired to fix room rates using Cendyn's Rainmaker algorithm. The algorithm allegedly recommended prices based on competitively-sensitive information shared among the casinos. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit revived the lawsuit, allowing the claims to proceed. The case is pending.

Company involved
Caesars Entertainment, Hard Rock, Borgata, MGM
AI system involved
Rainmaker

2 source articles · read the reporting →

Sixth Circuit Sanctions Lawyer for Using AI-Generated False Citations in Brief

Attorney Howe used Westlaw's CoCounsel AI to draft appellate briefs for a criminal defendant. The briefs contained fabricated quotations and misrepresented case holdings. The Sixth Circuit discovered the AI use from the file name and, upon investigation, found the citations false. Howe admitted he failed to adequately review the AI-generated content. The court denied compensation, appointed new counsel, and referred Howe for disciplinary proceedings.

Company involved
Howe's law office
AI system involved
Westlaw CoCounsel

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-DBUL6X20 Dec 2021

DOJ's Pattern Algorithm Shows Racial Disparities in Early Release Decisions

The U.S. Department of Justice's Pattern risk assessment algorithm, used to determine federal prisoners' eligibility for early release under the First Step Act, was found to produce racial disparities. A December 2021 DOJ report revealed that the tool overpredicted recidivism risk for Black, Hispanic, and Asian inmates, with only 7% of Black prisoners classified as minimum risk compared to 21% of white prisoners. Civil rights groups have called for the suspension of the tool, while the DOJ is working on an overhaul and reevaluating 14,000 prisoners who were misclassified.

Company involved
U.S. Department of Justice
AI system involved
Pattern

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-H9X6M91 May 2020

Australian terrorism prediction tool Vera-2R flagged autism as criminality risk factor

An independent report found that the Australian government's Vera-2R terrorism risk assessment tool included autism spectrum disorders as a risk factor without empirical evidence. The tool was used to assess terrorist offenders, influencing post-sentence orders including ongoing detention. Despite the critical report being received in May 2020, the federal and NSW governments continued to use the tool. The report concluded the tool was 'extremely poor' at predicting risk.

Company involved
Department of Home Affairs
AI system involved
Vera-2R

1 source article · read the reporting →

Gamma AI Presentation Tool Exploited in Multi-Stage Phishing Campaign

Threat actors used Gamma, an AI-powered presentation builder, to host a page that redirected recipients to a fake Microsoft SharePoint login portal. Emails sent from compromised legitimate accounts passed authentication checks, while a Cloudflare Turnstile blocked automated security scanners. An adversary-in-the-middle framework validated credentials in real time and captured session cookies, enabling multi-factor authentication bypass on Microsoft accounts. Abnormal reported the campaign on 15 April 2025.

AI system involved
Gamma

7 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-9B50OB2 Jun 2025

In re Marla C. Martin (N.D. Illinois (Bankruptcy)): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Sanction of $5,500 and mandatory AI education

Generated fake case citations used in a legal brief, misleading the court and opposing parties.

Company involved
Semrad
AI system involved
ChatGPT

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-NI986730 Jun 2025

Woody Nora v. M & A Transport, Inc., et al. (E.D. Louisiana): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Sanction; 1…

The AI tool generated fictitious case law citations that were included in a court filing, affecting the plaintiff and the court.

AI system involved
Westlaw Precision

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-FSUUWV6 Apr 2018

Durham Police uses Experian Mosaic data in HART AI risk tool

Durham Constabulary developed the Harm Assessment Risk Tool (HART), a machine learning algorithm that assesses the recidivism risk of offenders. The tool uses 34 data categories including criminal history, age, gender and two types of postcode, one sourced from Experian's Mosaic marketing segmentation system. Big Brother Watch alleges that using such commercial consumer behaviour data to inform custody decisions risks prejudice and disproportionate targeting of deprived neighbourhoods. The force has stated it is refreshing the model with an aim to remove one of the postcode predictors.

Company involved
Durham Constabulary
AI system involved
Harm Assessment Risk Tool (HART)

9 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-6RCCSA1 Nov 2025

Myeesha Parker v. Costco Wholesale Corp. (W.D. Washington): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Fine, Adverse Costs Order, Bar Referral

The lawyer submitted AI-generated court documents containing false citations and quotes, harming his client's discrimination case.

AI system involved
Callidus AI

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-WRPSEM1 Jan 2024

Air Canada Chatbot Fabricates Discount, Leading to Court Case

Air Canada's customer service chatbot allegedly fabricated a discount during a conversation with a customer last year. The incident resulted in a court case against the airline. Insurer Armilla stated that its new AI mishap policy would have covered the loss from selling tickets at the discounted price if the chatbot was found to have underperformed.

Company involved
Air Canada
AI system involved
chatbot

6 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-YN82N221 Jul 2026

Evans v. Robertson (4) (E.D. Michigan): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Briefs (both sides) struck

The AI system generated hallucinated legal citations in court filings, causing the court to strike the briefs of both plaintiff and defendant.

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-2GUL3Q23 Dec 2025

Kalala v. Coopérative d'habitation La Fraternité Micheloise (CS Québec): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Sanction

The AI generated fabricated case law that was included in a court filing, misleading the court and resulting in sanctions against the litigant.

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-JR9HJC18 Feb 2025

Unnamed Brazilian litigant (): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Appeal partially granted (reintegration suspended, rent imposed), but

AI-generated fake court precedents were included in a legal appeal, leading to sanctions against the litigant for bad-faith litigation.

AI system involved
ChatGPT

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-PWRNUQ2 Oct 2025

The People v. Raziel Ruiz Alvarez (CA California): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Published order; monetary sanction payable by Counsel…

The AI generated fabricated legal citations that were included in a court filing, affecting the defendant's legal representation and the court's resources.

Company involved
Attorney Siddell

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-ZQ3YFL1 Dec 2020

Retorio AI personality test swayed by candidate appearance in BR experiment

Bayerischer Rundfunk journalists conducted experiments with Retorio's AI video interview analysis tool. The AI, which assesses personality traits from short videos, produced different scores when the same actress changed her appearance (glasses, headscarf, wig) or the video background and lighting were altered. The start-up Retorio acknowledged that the AI considers external image, similar to a human interviewer. Experts warned that such software could perpetuate stereotypes and unfairly affect job candidates.

AI system involved
Retorio AI

10 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-HKN1QB9 Dec 2025

Johnson / Estate of Fisher v. City of Annapolis (D. Maryland): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, (Attorney was dismissed by…

The AI generated fabricated case law and quotes that were included in a court filing, affecting the plaintiffs and the judicial process.

Company involved
City of Annapolis

1 source article · read the reporting →

page 1 of 2Older →