An AI-supervised remote exam went so badly that 58,000 students must retake it - Ars Technica
An AI-supervised remote exam required 58,000 students to retake it.
- Company
- UNAM
- AI system
- Territorium AI proctoring system
Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.
Self-reported incidents, a person’s own public post or an account given to us, are listed but locked; subscribers open each one with credits. Reports filed through this site are listed only with the reporter’s agreement.
Press reportingSelf-reported: a person’s own public post · 10 creditsSelf-reported: told to us directly · 25 credits
An AI-supervised remote exam required 58,000 students to retake it.
Recorded and posted videos of students without consent, leading to harassment and bullying.
The system identified vehicles and their movements, leading to potential disciplinary actions against police officers.
An Apache Junction police officer resigned before termination proceedings were completed, after an internal investigation found he had improperly used Automated Licence Plate Reader technology to locate a family member. The department said the officer accessed law-enforcement technology for a purpose unrelated to any authorised investigation or official police business, and confirmed the investigation was complete at a media briefing.
AI chatbots provide health advice and potential diagnoses to people seeking medical information
The system restricted access to WhatsApp features for users suspected of violating terms of service.
An AI scribe falsely recorded that a patient micro-dosed psychedelic mushrooms, which was included in her post-operative medical letter.
YouTube's AI detection system flagged and penalized a human-made video from the Kurzgesagt channel as AI-generated content, reducing its visibility and viewership.
Identifying individuals as potential matches to a police watchlist, affecting those scanned
A prosecutor in the Nevada County District Attorney's Office used artificial intelligence to prepare a court filing, which then contained inaccurate legal citations. In October the Civil Rights Corps petitioned the California Supreme Court seeking sanctions against the office, after an earlier petition was denied in the Third Appellate District. The California Public Defenders Association filed an amicus letter supporting the petition. District Attorney Jesse Wilson declined an interview but said AI "remains an evolving technology with significant limitations, including the potential to generate inaccurate or hallucinated citations".
The system incorrectly identified a citizen's vehicle as stolen, leading to repeated police flags.
It flagged passers-by for police attention based on a watch list.
Flock, the US surveillance firm, is rolling out new safeguards against police misuse of its technology, which founder and chief executive Garrett Langley admits should have happened sooner. Police have used Flock to track romantic partners and stalk strangers, prompting growing public backlash. Asked whether the company had taken too long to protect its tens of thousands of cameras, licence plate readers and drones from police abuse, Langley said "Yeah."
The system recommended termination of a retail store employee for repeated lateness.
License plate data was searched to track individuals for immigration enforcement purposes.
The system identified the plaintiff as a suspect, leading to their arrest.
Job applicants were rejected or filtered out before human review
A former Mayo Clinic executive filed a federal whistleblower lawsuit accusing the hospital of cutting corners in its rush to incorporate AI, by skirting review boards and masking concerning error rates. The plaintiff, former Mayo research director and AI compliance lead Traci Tamiko Eto, alleges Mayo retaliated against her and dismissed her after she raised concerns about its AI practices. Mayo Clinic responded in late July with a 33-page memorandum disputing her claims, particularly the allegation that her termination resulted from discrimination.
A San Antonio appeals court dismissed a mother's lawsuit against San Antonio Independent School District over her fifth-grade son's discipline, ruling that state courts had no authority to review the case, and rebuked her attorney for citing four court decisions that either did not exist or did not say what he claimed. The case arose from 10 September 2025, when 10-year-old Julian Cortez was detained, suspended and assigned to a 25-day alternative school programme after bringing a child-safe Montessori fruit knife to Mark Twain Dual Language Academy.
A Texas biotechnology teacher sued IDEA Public Schools in the Southern District of Texas on 26 August 2026, alleging he was pushed out through a false disciplinary case after reporting a suspected illegal drug he found during student drop-off duty. He handed the item to a facilities manager, who later told him police had confirmed it was an illegal drug. When he warned colleagues over a campus Microsoft Teams chat, a principal replied that the matter was closed and deleted his message. He was subsequently accused of using "deepfake AI". The 51-year-old is representing himself and alleges unequal treatment and retaliation for raising safety concerns.
An HR commentary piece arguing that delegating candidate selection to an algorithm does not shield an employer from failure-to-hire liability, particularly where age bias is written into the prompts. It analyses an account posted on X by a self-described general counsel describing an AI hiring system that screened out older applicants. The author states she believes the account is probably fictional, though based on a real if exaggerated situation.
An anonymous music producer was allegedly not paid for AI voice modeling and production work they completed for Kanye West's music projects.
The Tesla's autopilot system drove the car into a home, killing Martha Avila.
The system took meeting notes, potentially affecting meeting participants.
Each incident is written from the reporting or the account it cites. A report is an allegation, not a finding.